2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Prospective Study of Glove Perforation in Orthopaedic Surgery: Is a Thick Glove More Effective?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
25
2
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
25
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not attempt to assess differences in intraoperative surgeon detection rates between the different gloving methods used in this study. We were, however, able to confirm associations between duration of surgery and surgical role (primary surgeon vs assistant) with increased contamination events . Contrary to other studies, we did not find that the use of powered instruments, surgical wire, or the effect of nondominant versus dominant hand were associated with contamination events.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not attempt to assess differences in intraoperative surgeon detection rates between the different gloving methods used in this study. We were, however, able to confirm associations between duration of surgery and surgical role (primary surgeon vs assistant) with increased contamination events . Contrary to other studies, we did not find that the use of powered instruments, surgical wire, or the effect of nondominant versus dominant hand were associated with contamination events.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, our study is the first randomized controlled trial comparing double gloving with standard gloves to orthopedic reinforced gloves during orthopedic surgery. No difference between double gloving with standard gloves and double gloving with one standard and one orthopedic glove was previously reported in a controlled trial comparing contamination events during orthopedic procedures . In this trial, the outer orthopedic glove was perforated in 4% of procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Limited data are available regarding risk of compromise of glove integrity in specific orthopaedic procedures [1,2,4,6,8,9,20]. At least one glove was found to be perforated in 39% of TKAs, with a perforation incidence of 4.29% of the gloves worn in these procedures [8]. The mechanism of contamination was not reported in that study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In their study, perforation was observed in 15.4% of gloves during the first 90 minutes of orthopaedic procedures and this increased to 18.1% if the glove was worn between 91 to 150 minutes, and to 23.7% if the glove was worn longer than 150 minutes [16]. Limited data are available regarding risk of compromise of glove integrity in specific orthopaedic procedures [1,2,4,6,8,9,20]. At least one glove was found to be perforated in 39% of TKAs, with a perforation incidence of 4.29% of the gloves worn in these procedures [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hester et al found a low rate (4.3 %) of glove perforation when a cloth glove was worn between two inner latex gloves and also has a lower impact on tactile sensation when compared to double gloving with an outer cloth glove, especially when manipulating cement (Hester et al 1992 ). Thick gloves do not seem to prevent perforation: in a randomized prospective study of glove perforation in orthopedic surgery, Han et al showed that thick gloves reduced tactile sensation and perforated as frequently as standard double gloves (Han et al 2013 ). Sutton et al showed that triple gloving with a cut-resistant liner interposed between two latex gloves significantly reduced the rate of perforation when com-pared to double gloving with two latex gloves (Sutton et al 1998 ).…”
Section: Surgical Glovesmentioning
confidence: 99%