2002
DOI: 10.1207/s15327914nc421_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Study of Nutritional Support in Patients With Colorectal and Gastric Cancer

Abstract: Involuntary weight loss is often seen among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Weight loss may influence quality of life (QoL) and is a predictor of survival. The present study is an attempt to improve body weight development in GI cancer patients by individual support (IS), including nutritional measures. Patients were randomized in a 2 x 2 design between 1) IS, including nutritional support, 2) group rehabilitation (GR), 3) IS + GR (ISGR), or 4) standard care (SC). Data concerning dietary intake (24… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
71
1
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
71
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…After excluding duplicate studies, and studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria based on reading title and abstract, 23 papers were selected for full-text examination. Eighteen papers were excluded; nine in which the target population was not clearly defined as patients with advanced cancer and/or treatment with curative intent was given [9,[14][15][16][17][18][19], four in which there was not given enough information to classify cachexia [20][21][22][23] and five in which the effect of other interventions than dietary counselling were evaluated [24][25][26][27][28]. The present review is thus based on two non-randomized studies and three RCT's.…”
Section: Search Results and Selection Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After excluding duplicate studies, and studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria based on reading title and abstract, 23 papers were selected for full-text examination. Eighteen papers were excluded; nine in which the target population was not clearly defined as patients with advanced cancer and/or treatment with curative intent was given [9,[14][15][16][17][18][19], four in which there was not given enough information to classify cachexia [20][21][22][23] and five in which the effect of other interventions than dietary counselling were evaluated [24][25][26][27][28]. The present review is thus based on two non-randomized studies and three RCT's.…”
Section: Search Results and Selection Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these findings, palliation of patients with malignant disease using treatments that attenuate systemic inflammation, 10,30 prevent anemia, 9 and improve energy balance via the provision of nutritional support 19 appears to be justified. The current study was designed to test the hypothesis that specialized, nutrition-focused patient care would provide added benefit for weight-losing patients with malignant disease who were receiving treatment for systemic inflammation as well as anemia prophylaxis.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, in upcoming studies, it probably would be more rewarding to focus on improving the effectiveness of nutritional support using additional interventions, such as appetite stimulation and interactive hormonal therapy, 42 perhaps in combination with palliative lowdose chemotherapy. 19,43 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Involuntary weight loss is another well-recognised problem affecting HRQOL in cancer patients (Persson et al, 2002). This problem may be decreased through early nutritional assessment and subsequent interventions for risk patients (Ravasco et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%