2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the dVSS can also realize the possibility of remote surgery, which is simpler and easier to learn for young doctors than traditional laparoscopy. [ 17 ] The dVSS has several specific surgical benefits: 3-dimensional vision, quicker learning curve, high definition, greater precision, and greater ergonomic potential [ 18 ] ; vNOTES hysterectomy assisted by dVSS is also more friendly for young surgeons. Studies have shown that for surgeons with experience in single-port laparoscopy and abdominal robotic surgery, they need to complete 10 cases of vNOTES hysterectomy assisted by dVSS, and 10 to 20 cases of port placement and robot docking can achieve proficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the dVSS can also realize the possibility of remote surgery, which is simpler and easier to learn for young doctors than traditional laparoscopy. [ 17 ] The dVSS has several specific surgical benefits: 3-dimensional vision, quicker learning curve, high definition, greater precision, and greater ergonomic potential [ 18 ] ; vNOTES hysterectomy assisted by dVSS is also more friendly for young surgeons. Studies have shown that for surgeons with experience in single-port laparoscopy and abdominal robotic surgery, they need to complete 10 cases of vNOTES hysterectomy assisted by dVSS, and 10 to 20 cases of port placement and robot docking can achieve proficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%