2014
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(14)61848-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Trial Comparing Dual Axis Rotational Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in a Population With High Prevalence of Coronary Artery Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, in the present study, 73% of the patients in DARCA group underwent DARCA combined with CCA. In addition, it is controversial whether DARCA may lead to a shorten or delay in PCI procedure [8,10,[22][23][24][25][26], our study found that there was no difference not only in the door to device time, but also in the CAG to device time, reflecting the procedure time, between the two groups of DARCA and CCA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Actually, in the present study, 73% of the patients in DARCA group underwent DARCA combined with CCA. In addition, it is controversial whether DARCA may lead to a shorten or delay in PCI procedure [8,10,[22][23][24][25][26], our study found that there was no difference not only in the door to device time, but also in the CAG to device time, reflecting the procedure time, between the two groups of DARCA and CCA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…En el análisis relativo a la radiación evaluado mediante Kerma-aire se agruparon 6 estudios 13,15,19,22,24,26 , suponiendo una población de 340 pacientes en el grupo de ACR y 343 pacientes en el grupo de ACC. Se detectó una diferencia estadísticamente significativa favorable a la ACR (diferencia estándar de medias [IC 95%] −0.842 [−1.104 a −0.581]; p < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified