2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized trial of eribulin monotherapy versus eribulin plus anlotinib in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 A phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin plus anlotinib in patients with ABC; the mPFS of the experimental group and the control group was 5.1 versus 3.5 months, respectively (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.32-0.98). 40 In our study, 88 patients received eribulin combination therapy, and the mPFS of the eribulin monotherapy and combination therapy was 4.0 and 5.0 months, respectively (Figure 2F). Multivariate Cox regression analysis found that eribulin combination therapy is a predictor of better specific PFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 A phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin plus anlotinib in patients with ABC; the mPFS of the experimental group and the control group was 5.1 versus 3.5 months, respectively (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.32-0.98). 40 In our study, 88 patients received eribulin combination therapy, and the mPFS of the eribulin monotherapy and combination therapy was 4.0 and 5.0 months, respectively (Figure 2F). Multivariate Cox regression analysis found that eribulin combination therapy is a predictor of better specific PFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Based on this study, a phase III study evaluating the triple combination of eribulin, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab in patients with Her2(+) ABC has been carried out 21 . A phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin plus anlotinib in patients with ABC; the mPFS of the experimental group and the control group was 5.1 versus 3.5 months, respectively (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.32–0.98) 40 . In our study, 88 patients received eribulin combination therapy, and the mPFS of the eribulin monotherapy and combination therapy was 4.0 and 5.0 months, respectively (Figure 2F).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, the addition of anlotinib did not increase the incidence of all grades of AEs, including grade 3–4 AEs. 15 Several clinical studies have also demonstrated that the combination of anlotinib and chemotherapy can be highly effective in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer while exhibiting acceptable toxicity. 16 , 17 The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of anlotinib are hypertension (67.7%), fatigue (52.0%), thyroid-stimulating hormone elevation (46.6%), hypertriglyceridemia (44.6%), hand-foot syndrome (43.9%), and hypercholesterolemia (41.8%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%