1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41358-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Trial of Etoposide + Cisplatin Versus Vinblastine + Bleomycin + Cisplatin + Cyclophosphamide + Dactinomycin in Patients with Good-Prognosis Germ Cell Tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies compared bleomycin-free regimens to conventional chemotherapies. The data of these trials were controversial regarding the efficacy: some authors observed similar results [13], while others reported that omission of bleomycin compromised the outcomes [3,14]. Though, all these studies showed agreement in that bleomycin-free regimens were associated with less toxicity compared to those with bleomycin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies compared bleomycin-free regimens to conventional chemotherapies. The data of these trials were controversial regarding the efficacy: some authors observed similar results [13], while others reported that omission of bleomycin compromised the outcomes [3,14]. Though, all these studies showed agreement in that bleomycin-free regimens were associated with less toxicity compared to those with bleomycin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The table presents a range of chemotherapy regimens used in treating good-prognosis non-seminoma; however, clearly specific toxicities do depend on the dose and drugs employed, and advances in oncology have defined regimens producing relatively low toxicity, e.g. those omitting bleomycin with its risk of lung damage, dermatitis and Raynaud's phenomenon [1,13]. Also a randomised trial has suggested that three cycles of bleomycirdetoposide/cisplatin chemotherapy may be as effective as the more standard four cycles in goodprognosis patients [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Etoposide (VP-16) has not been systematically evaluated as single agent therapy for malignant melanoma. However, potential synergy with CDDP in an in vitro tumor model [3] and enhanced efficacy of this combination in clinical trials in patients with other tumor types [4,5] prompted a phase II trial of CDDP plus VP-16 in patients with advanced malignant melanoma. Eligibility criteria included: advanced melanoma pathologically confirmed at Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center and not amenable to potentially curable surgery; age _ 18; Karnofsky performance status _> 60~ estimated survival _> 2 months; bidimensionally measurable indicator lesions; no more than one prior chemotherapy and no prior CDDP; at least one month interval since last radiation, or immunotherapy; white blood cell count _ 4,000//A; platelets _> 150,000/#1; creatinine _< 1.3 rag%; creatinine clearance > 60 ml/min/1.7 m2; bilirubin _< 1.5 mg%; and, informed consent.…”
Section: Introduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%