Abstract:Background-Prenatal repair of myelomeningocele, the most common form of spina bifida, may result in better neurologic function than repair deferred until after delivery. We compared outcomes of in utero repair with standard postnatal repair.
“…It showed that mid-gestational multilayered neurosurgical repair through laparotomy and hysterotomy (referred to as OFS) between 19 and 26 weeks of gestation reduces the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting, improves the degree of hindbrain herniation and better preserves motor function when compared with postnatal surgery (table 1). 26 Subsequently, the long-term outcomes of the full cohort have confirmed and extended on its initial findings 27 28 32–34. The standardised multilayered anatomical repair, which can be used in the majority of patients, is displayed in figure 1.…”
Section: Open Fetal Surgery For Sbamentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Following corporeal hysterotomy, uterine wall thinning may develop in 35% of cases and the risk of peripartal bleeding is increased in the index pregnancy (table 2). 26 Thinning may however increase the risk of potentially life-threatening uterine rupture in the index and future pregnancies. There are no numbers yet on uterine wall thinning or rupture or haemorrhagic complications following SBA repair in subsequent pregnancies, though earlier studies on other OFS procedures quote a rate of thinning/rupture of 14%.…”
Section: Open Fetal Surgery For Sbamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summary of results of the randomised MOMS trial 26. When data are available from the complete trial cohort only the latter ones are displayed 27 28 34.…”
Section: Open Fetal Surgery For Sbamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was translated clinically with encouraging early results in several small case series 23–25. Eventually, these promising initial results led to the randomised controlled Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS)26 which established the efficacy of fetal SBA repair. Fetal repair has however significant risks, such as premature delivery, maternal complications and the corporeal scar compromises uterine integrity 26–28.…”
Spina bifida aperta (SBA) is one of the most common congenital malformations. It can cause severe lifelong physical and neurodevelopmental disabilities. Experimental and clinical studies have shown that the neurological deficits associated with SBA are not simply caused by incomplete neurulation at the level of the lesion. Additional damage is caused by prolonged exposure of the spinal cord and nerves to the intrauterine environment and a suction gradient due to cerebrospinal fluid leakage, leading to progressive downward displacement of the hindbrain. This natural history can be reversed by prenatal repair. A randomised controlled trial demonstrated that mid-gestational maternal-fetal surgery for SBA decreases the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting and hindbrain herniation at 12 months and improves neurological motor function at 30 months of age. This came at the price of maternal and fetal risks, the most relevant ones being increased prematurity and a persistent uterine corporeal scar. Recently minimally invasive fetal approaches have been introduced clinically yet they lack extensive experimental or clinical trials. We aim to provide clinicians with the essential information necessary to counsel SBA parents as the basis for considering referral of selected patients to expert fetal surgery centres. We review the reported clinical outcomes and discuss recent developments of potentially less invasive fetal SBA approaches.
“…It showed that mid-gestational multilayered neurosurgical repair through laparotomy and hysterotomy (referred to as OFS) between 19 and 26 weeks of gestation reduces the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting, improves the degree of hindbrain herniation and better preserves motor function when compared with postnatal surgery (table 1). 26 Subsequently, the long-term outcomes of the full cohort have confirmed and extended on its initial findings 27 28 32–34. The standardised multilayered anatomical repair, which can be used in the majority of patients, is displayed in figure 1.…”
Section: Open Fetal Surgery For Sbamentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Following corporeal hysterotomy, uterine wall thinning may develop in 35% of cases and the risk of peripartal bleeding is increased in the index pregnancy (table 2). 26 Thinning may however increase the risk of potentially life-threatening uterine rupture in the index and future pregnancies. There are no numbers yet on uterine wall thinning or rupture or haemorrhagic complications following SBA repair in subsequent pregnancies, though earlier studies on other OFS procedures quote a rate of thinning/rupture of 14%.…”
Section: Open Fetal Surgery For Sbamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summary of results of the randomised MOMS trial 26. When data are available from the complete trial cohort only the latter ones are displayed 27 28 34.…”
Section: Open Fetal Surgery For Sbamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was translated clinically with encouraging early results in several small case series 23–25. Eventually, these promising initial results led to the randomised controlled Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS)26 which established the efficacy of fetal SBA repair. Fetal repair has however significant risks, such as premature delivery, maternal complications and the corporeal scar compromises uterine integrity 26–28.…”
Spina bifida aperta (SBA) is one of the most common congenital malformations. It can cause severe lifelong physical and neurodevelopmental disabilities. Experimental and clinical studies have shown that the neurological deficits associated with SBA are not simply caused by incomplete neurulation at the level of the lesion. Additional damage is caused by prolonged exposure of the spinal cord and nerves to the intrauterine environment and a suction gradient due to cerebrospinal fluid leakage, leading to progressive downward displacement of the hindbrain. This natural history can be reversed by prenatal repair. A randomised controlled trial demonstrated that mid-gestational maternal-fetal surgery for SBA decreases the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting and hindbrain herniation at 12 months and improves neurological motor function at 30 months of age. This came at the price of maternal and fetal risks, the most relevant ones being increased prematurity and a persistent uterine corporeal scar. Recently minimally invasive fetal approaches have been introduced clinically yet they lack extensive experimental or clinical trials. We aim to provide clinicians with the essential information necessary to counsel SBA parents as the basis for considering referral of selected patients to expert fetal surgery centres. We review the reported clinical outcomes and discuss recent developments of potentially less invasive fetal SBA approaches.
“…A randomised trial (MOMS) of prenatal versus postnatal repair myelomeningocele to postnatal surgery,9 used the BSID-II Psychomotor Development Index (PDI) score as a secondary outcome. There was a significant difference in the mean PDI score between the two groups (p=0.03).…”
Section: Different Approaches To Accounting For Death In Clinical Trialsmentioning
Progress in addressing the origins of intellectual and developmental disabilities accelerated with the establishment 50 years ago of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health and associated Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Centers. Investigators at these Centers have made seminal contributions to understanding human brain and behavioral development and defining mechanisms and treatments of disorders of the developing brain. ANN NEUROL 2019;86:332–343
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.