2022
DOI: 10.1177/07419325211058400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Trial of the Digital Down Syndrome LanguagePlus (DSL+) Vocabulary Intervention Program

Abstract: This study investigated the effect of the digital Down Syndrome LanguagePlus (DSL+) intervention on vocabulary outcomes through a school-delivered randomized controlled trial. A national sample of first graders with Down syndrome from 91 schools was allocated to an intervention group ( n = 50), which received daily intervention for 15 weeks, or a business-as-usual control group ( n = 53). The intervention involved picture book sharing and structured tasks and was organized as one-to-one, small-group, and full-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted this study to investigate whether parent-implemented oral vocabulary intervention for young children with DS would result in increased scores on mastery measures of targeted vocabulary. This study adds to the small number of previous studies that investigated technology-based oral vocabulary intervention (Rivera et al, 2013, 2017) and is one of few studies to focus on oral vocabulary intervention for children with DS (see Næss et al, 2021; O’Toole et al, 2018). We included four children ages 5 to 6 years, three of whom completed the adapted intervention (five stories, 40 to 57 sessions).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We conducted this study to investigate whether parent-implemented oral vocabulary intervention for young children with DS would result in increased scores on mastery measures of targeted vocabulary. This study adds to the small number of previous studies that investigated technology-based oral vocabulary intervention (Rivera et al, 2013, 2017) and is one of few studies to focus on oral vocabulary intervention for children with DS (see Næss et al, 2021; O’Toole et al, 2018). We included four children ages 5 to 6 years, three of whom completed the adapted intervention (five stories, 40 to 57 sessions).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We made several a priori adaptations to Næss et al’s (2021) procedures to increase (a) our ability to demonstrate a functional relation within single case research, and (b) feasibility for parent implementers. Næss et al included 22 stories in their original investigation and we chose five of these stories that the researchers identified as high-interest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 They usually present delayed speech ( Roberts et al, 2005 ) and speech errors ( Rosin, 1988 ). In a longitudinal study, Næss (2022) evaluated children with and without DS with similar non-verbal mental age, auditory memory, oral motor skills, and receptive vocabulary and found a slower growth of expressive vocabulary in people with DS than those with TD. People with DS also experience morphosyntactic difficulties in production: problems with gender and number agreement between articles and nouns ( Eadie et al, 2002 ), and errors in grammatical categories, including verbs, in spontaneous speech ( Chapman et al, 2000 ; Chapman, 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%