2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1583-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A RAPD, AFLP and SSR linkage map, and QTL analysis in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The female parent (S30) used in the V1 variety development and the present female parent S36 variety were evolved from the same EMS-treated open-pollinated seeds of the Berhampore Local genotype; hence, more similarities have been found between female (S36) and male (V1) parents. In this study, the higher percentage of intercross markers (61.32%) was similar to those found for other intraspecific crosses of forest trees (Barreneche et al 1998;Scalfi et al 2004). All intercross markers segregating 3:1 were excluded from map construction because these markers provide little information for linkage analysis (Maliepaard et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The female parent (S30) used in the V1 variety development and the present female parent S36 variety were evolved from the same EMS-treated open-pollinated seeds of the Berhampore Local genotype; hence, more similarities have been found between female (S36) and male (V1) parents. In this study, the higher percentage of intercross markers (61.32%) was similar to those found for other intraspecific crosses of forest trees (Barreneche et al 1998;Scalfi et al 2004). All intercross markers segregating 3:1 were excluded from map construction because these markers provide little information for linkage analysis (Maliepaard et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Both maps resulted in 12 linkage groups which correspond to the haploid chromosome complement in pine. Several other AFLP maps have been generated for conifers (Travis et al 1998;Yin et al 2003) and hardwoods (Cervera et al 2001;Scalfi et al 2004;Wu et al 2000;Zhang et al 2004). Generally, these conifer linkage maps result in greater than 12 linkage groups, more than the number of chromosomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grouping was initially carried out from LOD 2 to 10 with a step of one LOD, but in the end, the linkage map was grouped at LOD thresholds of 3 and subsequently filled in with those at 2; the lower end for trees (Cervera et al 2001;Chagne et al 2002;Jermstad et al 1998;Scalfi et al 2004;Travis et al 1998;Wu et al 2000), but deemed appropriate for this data set which employed a multiple family approach to linkage construction. All groups with ≥3 markers were retained for mapping.…”
Section: Linkage Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach allows also more finetuned studies of the genetic control of transpiration traits. These parameters can be directly used in search for association between genes and phenotypes such as QTL mapping (Scalfi et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%