A rapid assessment survey of invasive species of macrobenthic invertebrates in Korean waters

Park, Chul; Kim, Sung-Tae; Choi, Kyung Hwan

doi:10.1007/s12601-017-0024-5

Cited by 7 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Distribution of these species is influenced by low sea surface temperature resulted from the Liman Cold Current (LCC) from the north. One recent invasive barnacle species, Perforatus perforatus, has rapidly expanded its northern range along the east coast of Korea when compared with distribution records from 2008 (Choi et al, 2013) and 2013 (Park et al, 2017). Perforatus perforatus was first identified as an invasive species on the SE coast of Korea in 2008 (Choi et al, 2013).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The distribution of A. improvisus shrinks within the range previously reported by Kim (1998) and Park et al . (2017) (Figure 8A). The warm-water invasive species, A. eburneus , which tolerates low salinity (Southward, 1962; Henry & McLaughlin, 1975), was present in the East China Sea ecoregion and absent in the East Sea ecoregion in the present study (Figure 7B).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(A) Amphibalanus improvisus, (B) Perforatus perforatus. 1998 data were retrieved from Kim (1998), 2008 and 2013 information was obtained from Choi et al (2013) and Park et al (2017) respectively. Refer to Figure 2 for the increasing trend of seawater temperature in these three ecoregions for the last 20 years.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Biogeography of intertidal and subtidal native and invasive barnacles in Korea in relation to oceanographic current ecoregions and global climatic changes

Kim

Chan

Lee³

et al. 2020

J. Mar. Biol. Ass.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The coastline of the Korean Peninsula is influenced by three major oceanographic ecoregions, including the estuarine Yellow Sea ecoregion on the west coast, the warmer and saline East China Sea ecoregion on the south coast, and the cold East Sea ecoregion on the east coast. The influence of these marine ecoregions on the distribution of intertidal barnacles has not been extensively studied. The present study examines the biogeography of thoracican barnacles from intertidal and shallow subtidal zones, along the coasts of Korea. Twenty-one species in seven families were identified, including three species of coral-associated barnacles. Species composition varied significantly in the three marine ecoregions. Multivariate analysis showed barnacle assemblages were significant among the three ecoregions, although there are large overlaps of clusters between the Yellow Sea and East China Sea ecoregions. The estuarine species, Fistulobalanus albicostatus, occurred mainly in the Yellow Sea ecoregion; warm-water species, Tetraclita japonica, and sponge inhabiting barnacles Euacasta dofleini were observed in the East China Sea ecoregion; and cold-water species, Balanus rostratus and Perforatus perforatus, were found in the East Sea ecoregion. Four invasive barnacle species were recorded and the European barnacle Perforatus perforatus expanded its range northward from its recorded distribution nine years earlier. The cold-water species, Chthamalus dalli and Semibalanus cariosus, previously recorded in the East Sea ecoregion, were absent in the present survey. A trend of increasing seawater temperatures in Korean waters may have a significant impact on the distribution of cold-water species and enhance the northward invasion of P. perforatus.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Biogeography of intertidal and subtidal native and invasive barnacles in Korea in relation to oceanographic current ecoregions and global climatic changes

Kim

Chan

Lee³

et al. 2020

J. Mar. Biol. Ass.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These vectors have been or now include the extensive niche areas on or in ocean-going vessels that transport fouling, entangled, and ballasted organisms, sea level (such as the Suez) and lock (Panama) canals, mariculture (aquaculture), the aquarium and saltwater bait industries, and long-distance rafting on anthropogenic debris. Reviews of some marine bionvasions successfully introduced via these mechanisms or corridors are available, for example, for North America (Cohen and Carlton, 1995; Ruiz et al, 2000, 2011, 2015), Europe (Wolff, 2005; Gollasch, 2006; Galil et al, 2014), the Mediterranean (Galil, 2009; Rilov and Galil, 2009; Ulman et al, 2017), the Azores (Cardigos et al, 2006) and Madeira (Canning-Clode et al, 2013), South Africa (Mead et al, 2011; Alexander et al, 2016), Argentina (Orensanz et al, 2002), Brazil (Ferreira et al, 2009); the Pacific coast of Mexico (Low-Pfeng and Peters-Recagno, 2012), Chile (Villasenor-Parada et al, 2017), the Hawaiian Islands (Carlton and Eldredge, 2009, 2015), Japan (Otani, 2006), China (Xiong et al, 2017), Korea (Park et al, 2017), Australia (Wyatt et al, 2005, and references therein; Sliwa et al, 2009), and New Zealand (Hayden et al, 2009). The majority of these introduced species—whether phytoplankton, foraminifera, other protists, invertebrates, fish, or plants—are recognized as neocosmopolitan taxa based upon morphological and other criteria noted above.…”

Section: Neocosmopolitanism:human-mediated Spread and The Creation Ofmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Framework for Understanding Marine Cosmopolitanism in the Anthropocene

Darling

Carlton

2018

Front. Mar. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent years have witnessed growing appreciation for the ways in which human-mediated species introductions have reshaped marine biogeography. Despite this we have yet to grapple fully with the scale and impact of anthropogenic dispersal in both creating and determining contemporary distributions of marine taxa. In particular, the past several decades of research on marine biological invasions have revealed that broad geographic distributions of coastal marine organisms—historically referred to simply as “cosmopolitanism”—may belie complex interplay of both natural and anthropogenic processes. Here we describe a framework for understanding contemporary cosmopolitanism, informed by a synthesis of the marine bioinvasion literature. Our framework defines several novel categories in an attempt to provide a unified terminology for discussing cosmopolitan distributions in the world’s oceans. We reserve the term eucosmopolitan to refer to those species for which data exist to support a true, natural, and prehistorically global (or extremely broad) distribution. While in the past this has been the default assumption for species observed to exhibit contemporary cosmopolitan distributions, we argue that given recent advances in marine invasion science this assignment should require positive evidence. In contrast, neocosmopolitan describes those species that have demonstrably achieved extensive geographic ranges only through historical anthropogenic dispersal, often facilitated over centuries of human maritime traffic. We discuss the history and human geography underpinning these neocosmopolitan distributions, and illustrate the extent to which these factors may have altered natural biogeographic patterns. We define the category pseudocosmopolitan to encompass taxa for which a broad distribution is determined (typically after molecular investigation) to reflect multiple, sometimes regionally endemic, lineages with uncertain taxonomic status; such species may remain cosmopolitan only so long as taxonomic uncertainty persists, after which they may splinter into multiple geographically restricted species. We discuss the methods employed to identify such species and to resolve both their taxonomic status and their biogeographic histories. We argue that recognizing these different types of cosmopolitanism, and the important role that invasion science has played in understanding them, is critically important for the future study of both historical and modern marine biogeography, ecology, and biodiversity.

show abstract

“…Distribution and dissemination of invasive barnacles in Korean coastal waters are usually influenced by ships, and several invasive barnacles have already spread to all Korean coasts (East sea, Korea Strait, and Yellow Sea) [14]. The first reported points of entry for invasive barnacles in the Korean seas were in parts of the Korea Strait and the East Sea [15][16][17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Settlement and Recruitment Potential of Four Invasive and One Indigenous Barnacles in South Korea and Their Future

Ubagan

Lee

et al. 2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Invasion by nonindigenous species is a major threat to marine ecosystems. In this study, the distribution and occupied area (as a percentage) of four invasive barnacles (Amphibalanus amphitrite, Amphibalanus eburneus, Amphibalanus improvisus, Perforatus perforatus), and one indigenous (Balanus trigonus) barnacle in 13 ports in three Korean seas (East sea, Korea Strait, and Yellow Sea) were investigated. The average ratio for all five species was 11.17% in summer and 7.59% in winter, indicating a higher occupancy in summer. B. trigonus, which is an indigenous species, was found on all ports, except for one (IC). Of the invasive species, A. amphitrite was found mainly in the Yellow Sea, A. improvisus in the Korea Strait, and A. eburneus along with P. perforatus were found in the East Sea. From nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis, six parameters related to water temperature and salinity were found to be significantly correlated with the distribution and occupancy status of these five barnacles. Using the six parameters as independent variables, random forest (RF) models were developed. Based on these models, the predicted future dominant invasive species were A. improvisus and A. amphitrite in the Yellow Sea and P. perforatus in the East Sea and Korea Strait. This study suggests that long-term monitoring of invasive species is crucial, and that determining the relationship between the results of monitoring and environmental variables can be helpful in predicting the damage caused by invasive species resulting from environmental changes.

show abstract

A rapid assessment survey of invasive species of macrobenthic invertebrates in Korean waters

Cited by 7 publications

References 6 publications

Biogeography of intertidal and subtidal native and invasive barnacles in Korea in relation to oceanographic current ecoregions and global climatic changes

Biogeography of intertidal and subtidal native and invasive barnacles in Korea in relation to oceanographic current ecoregions and global climatic changes

A Framework for Understanding Marine Cosmopolitanism in the Anthropocene

Settlement and Recruitment Potential of Four Invasive and One Indigenous Barnacles in South Korea and Their Future

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About