2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13355-015-0340-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid method of non-destructive DNA extraction from individual springtails (Collembola)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 99 and 134 unique sequences of mtCOI and mt16S were found, respectively. Of these, mtCOI sequences from nine species were already published as part of the study by Aoyama et al (2015). We found that the 454 sequencer frequently yielded multiple sequence types from a single specimen (76 and 103 specimens out of 190 total specimens sequenced for mtCOI and mt16S genes, respectively), which were considered to be unlikely as PCR or sequencing errors because they were found in both directions of reads and from multiple conspecific specimens whose PCR reactions were constructed independently.…”
Section: Collection Of Reference Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 99 and 134 unique sequences of mtCOI and mt16S were found, respectively. Of these, mtCOI sequences from nine species were already published as part of the study by Aoyama et al (2015). We found that the 454 sequencer frequently yielded multiple sequence types from a single specimen (76 and 103 specimens out of 190 total specimens sequenced for mtCOI and mt16S genes, respectively), which were considered to be unlikely as PCR or sequencing errors because they were found in both directions of reads and from multiple conspecific specimens whose PCR reactions were constructed independently.…”
Section: Collection Of Reference Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To construct a reference database linking metabarcoding sequences to morphological species, mtCOI and mt16S gene sequences were collected as follows: total DNA was extracted from collembolan specimens by a nondestructive method (Aoyama et al 2015). After DNA extraction, the specimens were mounted on glass slides and identified to the species level based on morphological traits observed under a microscope according to the literature (Suma 2009;Tanaka 2010;Niijima and Hasegawa 2011;Hasegawa and Niijima 2012;Ichisawa 2012;Itoh et al 2012;Hasegawa and Tanaka 2013;Furuno et al 2014;Nakamori et al 2014).…”
Section: Collection Of Reference Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer heating steps are present in all approaches with digestion steps for non-destructive DNA isolation [ 11 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ]. Longer or repetitive heating steps are also used in direct PCR methods [ 13 , 37 , 41 ], the HotSHOT method [ 20 , 41 ], the Chelex method [ 35 , 43 ], the TE-boiling method [ 50 ], and the TNES method [ 51 ] for arthropods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial regions of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (CO1; 658 bp) and 16S ribosomal RNA (16S; 445 bp) genes were selected as primary and supporting DNA barcoding markers, respectively. The supporting marker previously used for Japanese Collembola (Aoyama et al, 2015;Saitoh et al, 2016;Babenko & Nakamori, 2017;Potapov et al 2017;Nakamori et al, 2020;Ohira et al, under review) was included in this study for cases for which that the primary marker was not available. To study a specimen both morphologically and molecularly, DNA was extracted as described in Aoyama et al (2015), with complete specimens being boiled in buffer.…”
Section: Methods Of Molecular Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supporting marker previously used for Japanese Collembola (Aoyama et al, 2015;Saitoh et al, 2016;Babenko & Nakamori, 2017;Potapov et al 2017;Nakamori et al, 2020;Ohira et al, under review) was included in this study for cases for which that the primary marker was not available. To study a specimen both morphologically and molecularly, DNA was extracted as described in Aoyama et al (2015), with complete specimens being boiled in buffer. The DNA barcode sequence fragments were amplified using PCR and the DNA sequences of the fragments were determined by a direct Sanger sequencing.…”
Section: Methods Of Molecular Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%