2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid, non-invasive and non-destructive method for studying swelling behavior and microstructure variations of hydrogels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the structure investigation, the effort has been addressed mainly toward the understanding of the liquid crystalline self-assembly resulting in ordered helical structures with peculiar mechanical and optical properties [7][8][9]. The self-assembly of NC or NC-composites into soft hydrogels [10,11] has been characterized in terms of macroscopic parameters such as mesh size, charge density, gelation rate, mechanical performances, or stability [12][13][14][15]. In this context, rheology experiments have been performed and a gel-like behavior of NC suspensions with an elastic response even at a low concentration [16] has been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the structure investigation, the effort has been addressed mainly toward the understanding of the liquid crystalline self-assembly resulting in ordered helical structures with peculiar mechanical and optical properties [7][8][9]. The self-assembly of NC or NC-composites into soft hydrogels [10,11] has been characterized in terms of macroscopic parameters such as mesh size, charge density, gelation rate, mechanical performances, or stability [12][13][14][15]. In this context, rheology experiments have been performed and a gel-like behavior of NC suspensions with an elastic response even at a low concentration [16] has been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both T 1 and T 2 (and consequently R 1 and R 2 ) of a sample can be extracted simultaneously from a CP‐CWFP experiment, T 2 is prone to interference arising from features not linked to the free‐radical effect on relaxation, such as chemical exchange and diffusion . The influence of these factors is better observed when relaxation time distributions are plotted for each monitored period of the reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…water molecules with restricted molecular mobility due to interactions with the solute. Their presence during the reactions is observed as isolated spots on the map's surface at T 2 values smaller than 3 s, which is the transverse relaxation time of bulk, non‐solvating water molecules in the spectrometer's magnetic field strength (0.54 T) . The number and intensity of relaxation domains pertaining to water molecules with restricted mobility is positively correlated with the monomer feed during the sample formulation, being in all likelihood the consequence of the solvation process undergone by the newly created polymer chains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the copolymer–water mixtures, two types of major peaks due to water are observed in Figure (B–E), in the region from 20 to 100 ms and in the region from 200 to 500 ms. Their shift from the single water peak in Figure (A) reflects chemical exchanges with labile protons on the polymers as well as diffusive exchange of water in different microenvironment. The shorter the T 2 relaxation time, the harder to exchange and the slower the re‐orientational mobility of the water molecules . Peaks d, h, l, and p can all be assigned to the tightly bound water molecules with very restricted rotational mobility (slow re‐orientational mobility) in the copolymers, while peaks e, i, m, and t can all be attributed to the loosely bound water with fast re‐orientational mobility in the polymers (the minor peaks below 10 ms are due to the protons in the polymer).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This important parameter reveals different mobility and distributions of water components in the aqueous system. Because of the chemical exchange between water protons and labile protons on a polymer as well as the diffusive exchange of water in different microenvironment, T 2 of water protons in polymer solution is usually smaller than that in neat water . Therefore, T 2 of water protons also gives indirect information on the polymer chain dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%