1984
DOI: 10.1159/000299144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rapid, Noninvasive Method for Evaluation of Total Menstrual Loss

Abstract: Three types of packages containing enough sanitary supplies for one menstrual period were weighed and distributed to 100 subjects to determine adequacy of supplies and compliance to protocol. Returned packages were then reweighed to determine total menstrual loss. No subject used all the supplies in her package; therefore, packages contents were deemed ample. 7 subjects added their own purchased products to their packages; since added products were specified by name, weight corrections were easily made. 2 subj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the questionnaire, plus sign indicates Byes,^minus sign indicates Bno,^and question mark indicates Bunclear.^G labeled isotopes conveyed some radiation exposure hazards and did not provide higher accuracy compared to spectrophotometric methods [20]. Because direct methods were sophisticated and were not suitable for implementation among general population, another approach was to indirectly calculate hemoglobin contents by weighing sanitary product before and after use [21]. Despite being simpler, the accuracy of this method is limited by the variability in the blood content of menstrual fluid which ranges between 30 and 50 % of total menstrual fluid volume and which differs from day to day during menstrual period [22,23].…”
Section: Objective Methods For Assessment Of Mblmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the questionnaire, plus sign indicates Byes,^minus sign indicates Bno,^and question mark indicates Bunclear.^G labeled isotopes conveyed some radiation exposure hazards and did not provide higher accuracy compared to spectrophotometric methods [20]. Because direct methods were sophisticated and were not suitable for implementation among general population, another approach was to indirectly calculate hemoglobin contents by weighing sanitary product before and after use [21]. Despite being simpler, the accuracy of this method is limited by the variability in the blood content of menstrual fluid which ranges between 30 and 50 % of total menstrual fluid volume and which differs from day to day during menstrual period [22,23].…”
Section: Objective Methods For Assessment Of Mblmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were instructed to return all used and unused sanitary' supplies to the package including zip strips, applicators, etc. If all supplies were re turned, then the difference in weight constituted the menstrual flow [6]. Within each month's package, sup plies for the first 3 days were individually packaged and preweighed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total menstrual weights were obtained for each subject via a direct weight method [7], Enough sani tary supplies for 1 monthly period were packaged and preweighed. Subjects were instructed to return all used and unused sanitary supplies to the package including zip strips, applicators, etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%