2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41415-020-1846-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid review of variation in the use of dental general anaesthetics in children

Abstract: The use of dental general anaesthetics (DGAs) remains a cause for concern due to additional strains placed on health services. There are numerous factors influencing the prevalence and use of DGAs, and understanding these is an important first step in addressing the issue. AimConduct a rapid review of current peer reviewed and grey literature on the variation in the use of dental general anaesthetics in children. MethodsElectronic searching using MEDLINE via Ovid covering DGA articles from 1998 onwards, writte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study also indicated that the majority of patients referred for treatment under GA/sedation had a mean age of 5.9 years. These findings were consistent with other reports examining the treatment and outcomes of children receiving GA [3,5,7,[12][13][14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study also indicated that the majority of patients referred for treatment under GA/sedation had a mean age of 5.9 years. These findings were consistent with other reports examining the treatment and outcomes of children receiving GA [3,5,7,[12][13][14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The significant delay in receiving treatment can be due to a variety of patient-related and institution-related factors [14,22,23]. Limited access to affordable GA/sedation services for children was reported to be the main barrier for many parents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Along with the cessation of routine dental services in March 2020, many hospitals throughout England also cancelled elective tooth extraction lists and comprehensive care lists in order to accommodate the anticipated increased capacity needed to treat COVID-19 patients. 38,39 The lower provision of these services also impacts people from vulnerable groups (for example, those with learning disabilities) who may require hospital services, often with general anaesthesia, for the provision of dental care.…”
Section: Access To Secondary Dental Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 admissions for tooth extractions are strongly socially patterned with children living in more deprived areas being more likely to receive this care and have more teeth removed during an episode. 37,38 The reduction in hospital tooth extractions impacted, in terms of absolute numbers, more upon the deprived children, even though it was proportionately similar across socio-economic groups. For example, the rate of hospital tooth extraction episodes per 100,000 population dropped from 122 between March to May 2019 to 30 between March to May 2020 among the most deprived children (a difference of 92 per 100,000), while the respective figures among the least deprived were 31 and 7, a difference of 24 per 100,000 (Fig.…”
Section: Access To Secondary Dental Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Further evidence is provided by an extensive review of variations in the use of general dental anaesthesia for children. 35 A survey of 1,783 children compared artificially fluoridated water in Newcastle to Manchester. While the level of deprivation for both cities was comparable, there was significantly less caries experience in Newcastle.…”
Section: Fces As % Of 0-5-year-oldsmentioning
confidence: 99%