1997
DOI: 10.1097/00001721-199704000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rapid screen for lupus anticoagulant with good discrimination from oral anticoagulants, congenital factor deficiency and heparin, is provided by comparing a sensitive and an insensitive APTT reagent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evidence so far accumulated would suggest that 1 of the 2 should be the dRVVT and the other may be based on the intrinsic pathway of coagulation (APTT, KCT, or SCT). If the choice is the APTT, it is important to adopt a sensitive reagent, although some authors contend that a combination of 2 APTTs, 1 sensitive and the other insensitive to LA, may give better detection capability (21,32 ). One positive test only may suffice to diagnose LA provided that its positivity is documented on 2 occasions 12 weeks apart (2 ).…”
Section: Choice Of Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence so far accumulated would suggest that 1 of the 2 should be the dRVVT and the other may be based on the intrinsic pathway of coagulation (APTT, KCT, or SCT). If the choice is the APTT, it is important to adopt a sensitive reagent, although some authors contend that a combination of 2 APTTs, 1 sensitive and the other insensitive to LA, may give better detection capability (21,32 ). One positive test only may suffice to diagnose LA provided that its positivity is documented on 2 occasions 12 weeks apart (2 ).…”
Section: Choice Of Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the flurry of the Friday afternoon when the acquired factor VIII inhibitor was detected, whilst the patient was administrated the first dose of recombinant factor VII and then transferred to Bradford Royal Infirmary, we overlooked that the Actin FS aPTTr was shorter than the Synthesil aPTTr (3.21 vs 5.03): a study comparing sensitive and insensitive reagents to the LA showed that the shortening of the aPTTr with Actin FS (the insensitive reagent) can be suggestive of LA even in patients on oral anticoagulants and/or with acquired haemophilia [3]. Hence we could not rule out that our patient also had a LA that was not detected on subsequent testing because of the immunosuppressive treatment she received.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1988 in Airedale the possibility of a bleeding disorder was tested by comparing the clotting times of two aPTT reagents, currently Synthesil (IL) as the reagent sensitive to factor inhibitors and deficiencies and Actin FS (Dade) as the reagent insensitive to factor inhibitors and deficiencies but sensitive to factor XII deficiency [2]. Unbeknown to the laboratory personnel the same comparison can be used to detect a lupus anticoagulant [3]. Both assays are run on an automated coagulometer (TOP-CTS, Instrumentation Laboratories).…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of aPTT to lupus anticoagulant is variable and strongly influenced by the source [7] and concentration [8] of the phospholipid in the reagent. Brancaccio et al [7] studied 23 patients with a known diagnosis of lupus anticoagulant, and found that when a sensitive reagent was used 96% of the patients had an abnormal aPTT ratio, against only 17% when the aPTT was performed with an insensitive vegetable-derived reagent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%