2015
DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.149198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rare case of cleidocranial dysplasia presenting with failure to thrive

Abstract: Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare (1:1,000,000) congenital condition secondary to spontaneous mutation (40%) or autosomal dominant inheritance (60%) affecting skeletal and dental systems. Hypomineralization of the hypoplastic clavicles and/or cranium is the major feature observed by prenatal ultrasound. Radiologically clavicles are hypoplastic or absent in chest X-ray. Delayed closure of the fontanelle and the skull sutures in pediatric and adolescent population and increased mobility of shoulders in all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The length of the femur was 67 mm (reference, 66 to 76), which was within the normal range. a short femoral neck and a wide symphysis pubis, which could lead to coxa vara and phalangeal abnormalities 14,15) . Hypoplasia of the skull and bilateral clavicles, a bell-shaped thoracic cage, and a wide symphysis pubis were observed in our patient.…”
Section: Laboratory Examination Revealed Normal Levels Of Total Calcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of the femur was 67 mm (reference, 66 to 76), which was within the normal range. a short femoral neck and a wide symphysis pubis, which could lead to coxa vara and phalangeal abnormalities 14,15) . Hypoplasia of the skull and bilateral clavicles, a bell-shaped thoracic cage, and a wide symphysis pubis were observed in our patient.…”
Section: Laboratory Examination Revealed Normal Levels Of Total Calcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, the imaging studies available for the diagnosis of CCD in dentistry were based on panoramic, cephalometric and posteroanterior radiographs. Unfortunately, these studies only provide a general vision and, in many cases, are distorted due to factors such as image magnification, superposition and patient position and are also insufficient to evaluate the entire craniofacial massif 10 , 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%