2021
DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2021.0091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rare Case of Conjunctival Myxoma Initially Misdiagnosed as a Conjunctival Inclusion Cyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14,1623 There was a slight male predominance (63.0%) in cases published after 2015, 1623 albeit earlier literature reviews reported no sexual predilections. 13,14 To the best of our knowledge, all lesions were of unilateral in the published literature 13,14,1623 ; and our current case (the 70 th case) is the first case of bilateral synchronous conjunctival myxoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13,14,1623 There was a slight male predominance (63.0%) in cases published after 2015, 1623 albeit earlier literature reviews reported no sexual predilections. 13,14 To the best of our knowledge, all lesions were of unilateral in the published literature 13,14,1623 ; and our current case (the 70 th case) is the first case of bilateral synchronous conjunctival myxoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Twenty-seven cases published after 2015 in the English literature identified from their systematic review and the authors" current case are presented in the Table 1. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] 95.6% (66/69) of the cases were over 18 years old adults, and the mean age was 46.5 years (range, 11 months-80 years). 13,14,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] There was a slight male predominance (63.0%) in cases published after 2015, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] albeit earlier literature reviews reported no sexual predilections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation