2017
DOI: 10.14693/jdi.v24i2.1065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rare Case of Oral Erythema Multiforme: A Case Report with a Literature Review

Abstract: Erythema multiforme (EM) is an acute mucocutaneous hypersensitivity reaction characterized by skin eruptions with or without oral or other mucous membrane lesions. The main two variants are erythema minor and erythema major. Oral disease with typical EM lesions has been suggested as a third variant of EM. Known as oral EM, it is reported less and has no target lesions unlike the other two types, in its primary presentation. Objective: To report a manifestation of a rare case of oral EM and discuss various form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The causative agent is thought to induce a T-cell-mediated immune reaction, resulting in a cytotoxic immunological attack on non-self-antigen-expressing keratinocytes, causing local inflammation such as vesicles, erosions, blisters, or ulceration of the tissue. 1 , 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The causative agent is thought to induce a T-cell-mediated immune reaction, resulting in a cytotoxic immunological attack on non-self-antigen-expressing keratinocytes, causing local inflammation such as vesicles, erosions, blisters, or ulceration of the tissue. 1 , 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farthing et al stated that EM due to herpes accounts for 20–50% of cases. 1 , 8 Investigations to establish the diagnosis of herpes infection are the Tzanck smear, serology, viral culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This patient underwent an anti-HSV-1 IgG serological examination using the ELISA technique, and the result was positive with a ratio of: 6.32 (positive: ratio > 1.1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations