2020
DOI: 10.4103/1319-2442.284036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rare case of sarcoidosis causing granulomatous interstitial nephritis presenting as non oliguric acute renal failure in the Indian subcontinent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A negative history of drug usage and workup excluding infection, vasculitis, and autoimmune causes established the clinical-pathological diagnosis of renal sarcoidosis. Most other case reports on renal sarcoidosis present with a more insidious onset, less debilitating clinical progression, and did not require immediate renal replacement therapy [ 15 , 18 , 19 ]; in significant contrast, the clinical course of this young male featured acute kidney failure that required hemodialysis, and it was the first manifestation that prompted the work up and led to the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Furthermore, sarcoidosis is known as a systemic granulomatous disease involving the lungs in 90% of cases [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A negative history of drug usage and workup excluding infection, vasculitis, and autoimmune causes established the clinical-pathological diagnosis of renal sarcoidosis. Most other case reports on renal sarcoidosis present with a more insidious onset, less debilitating clinical progression, and did not require immediate renal replacement therapy [ 15 , 18 , 19 ]; in significant contrast, the clinical course of this young male featured acute kidney failure that required hemodialysis, and it was the first manifestation that prompted the work up and led to the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Furthermore, sarcoidosis is known as a systemic granulomatous disease involving the lungs in 90% of cases [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%