1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01277.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rasch measurement model analysis of the Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory

Abstract: The Extended Logistic Model of Rasch was found to be useful in creating an interval level scale for the Inventory, and for analysing its psychometric properties and conceptual design. It is suggested that the Inventory can be improved conceptually by adding more items relating to attitudes, intentions and behaviour and by adding harder and easier items to target the student measures better.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these responses, 15 scales are produced which are subsequently grouped into six defining dimensions. Several studies have reported on the pyschometric properties of the RASI (Tait and Entwistle, 1996;Sadler-Smith and Tsang, 1998;Waugh and Addison, 1998; and generally, the RASI was found to give satisfactory scores of reliability and validity. Duff (2004, p. 65) concludes 'The measure, therefore, appears to have wide applicability for the specific facets of the ways individuals approach learning.…”
Section: Approaches To Studyingmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…From these responses, 15 scales are produced which are subsequently grouped into six defining dimensions. Several studies have reported on the pyschometric properties of the RASI (Tait and Entwistle, 1996;Sadler-Smith and Tsang, 1998;Waugh and Addison, 1998; and generally, the RASI was found to give satisfactory scores of reliability and validity. Duff (2004, p. 65) concludes 'The measure, therefore, appears to have wide applicability for the specific facets of the ways individuals approach learning.…”
Section: Approaches To Studyingmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In the first study, items with both Infit and Outfit MNSQ not in the range of 1.4 and 0.6 were considered muted or noised, and therefore poor fitting (Waugh and Addison 1998;Bond and Fox 2001). When items fit the model's expectation, the residuals (observed scores minus expected scores) should be randomly distributed (Hsueh et al 2004) (i.e., each other independent suitable for principal component analysis and not finding other dominants in the latent construct).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To achieve construct validity, the Rasch model (1960) was applied for analysis and the infit mean square (MNSQ) error values of the items were calculated to be between 0.95 and 1.18, which is between the suggested cutoffs of 0.6 and 1.4 (Linacre & Wright, 1994). In terms of reliability, the item separation reliability of the whole test was 0.95, which was above the suggested cutoff of 0.9 (Waugh & Addison, 1998). The validity and reliability were both within acceptable range.…”
Section: The Pisa Science Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 89%