2023
DOI: 10.3390/mi15010028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Real-Time Defect Detection Strategy for Additive Manufacturing Processes Based on Deep Learning and Machine Vision Technologies

Wei Wang,
Peiren Wang,
Hanzhong Zhang
et al.

Abstract: Nowadays, additive manufacturing (AM) is advanced to deliver high-value end-use products rather than individual components. This evolution necessitates integrating multiple manufacturing processes to implement multi-material processing, much more complex structures, and the realization of end-user functionality. One significant product category that benefits from such advanced AM technologies is 3D microelectronics. However, the complexity of the entire manufacturing procedure and the various microstructures o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With training on a small number of datasets, supervised models cannot obtain satisfactory results even for simple binary classification tasks. Obviously, increasing the training data would be a way to significantly improve the detection performance, but labeling a large amount of image data is bound to be a mechanically repetitive and tedious task for researchers [ 44 ]. When labeling the images used to train YOLOv8, the average time to label an image was tested to be about 4 min, while our method takes only about 7 s to label the pore defects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With training on a small number of datasets, supervised models cannot obtain satisfactory results even for simple binary classification tasks. Obviously, increasing the training data would be a way to significantly improve the detection performance, but labeling a large amount of image data is bound to be a mechanically repetitive and tedious task for researchers [ 44 ]. When labeling the images used to train YOLOv8, the average time to label an image was tested to be about 4 min, while our method takes only about 7 s to label the pore defects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%