3rd International Conference on Systems and Control 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icosc.2013.6750980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A real-time feedback scheduler for environmental energy harvesting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three real-time tasks can be categorized based on their delay tolerance: (1) Hard real-time tasks (HRT) cannot tolerate any delay (σ * = 0). If the system becomes overloaded in HRT, the schedulability test indicates insufficient resources exist by having dbf exceeds sbf at a given time interval t. Therefore, HRT should always be performed on the local embedded devices because of the negligible contact latency [18].…”
Section: System Model and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three real-time tasks can be categorized based on their delay tolerance: (1) Hard real-time tasks (HRT) cannot tolerate any delay (σ * = 0). If the system becomes overloaded in HRT, the schedulability test indicates insufficient resources exist by having dbf exceeds sbf at a given time interval t. Therefore, HRT should always be performed on the local embedded devices because of the negligible contact latency [18].…”
Section: System Model and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the power supply problem of the EHES system, the traditional battery-powered embedded system method cannot be used for EHES. Usually, researchers combine energy harvesting with traditional methods to form new methods [75,161,162]. Moreover, energy harvesting needs to consider how to stably and efficiently convert the collected energy [54,129,136,137].…”
Section: Challenge Of Energy Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for the timerandomised platform which has the best fit for pWCET techniques, there is a lack of trustworthiness of the provided results due to their strong dependence on the assumptions made in the measurement, particular hardware features, or a number of other aspects [48]. Moreover, if the target task's execution time varies a lot from one instance to another, which is highly possible due to the impact of unpredictable environment and high complexity of the system, using offline WCET estimates as a task's bandwidth budget can cause low resource usage [36,[49][50][51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%