2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11161858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Real-Time On-Orbit Signal Tracking Algorithm for GNSS Surface Observations

Abstract: This manuscript describes real-time on-orbit instrument compatible open loop signal tracking techniques for Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) reflection observations. All GNSS-reflection (GNSS-R) satellite instruments require algorithms which run in real-time on-board the satellite, that are capable of predicting the code phase time delay and Doppler frequency of surface reflected signals. The algorithms presented here are for open loop tracking techniques in reflected GNSS signals for the purposed of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that the specular point prediction algorithm applied in TDS-1 and CYGNSS is called the quasi-spherical Earth (QSE) approach [21], and it brings about a three-kilometer-level position error [22], which may cause trouble in DDM data processing and blur the boundary of the land-sea interface. Another conventional specular point prediction method named the minimum path length (MPL) [23,24], however, has a huge computation burden, and its accuracy varies with latitude.…”
Section: Gnss Ro Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the specular point prediction algorithm applied in TDS-1 and CYGNSS is called the quasi-spherical Earth (QSE) approach [21], and it brings about a three-kilometer-level position error [22], which may cause trouble in DDM data processing and blur the boundary of the land-sea interface. Another conventional specular point prediction method named the minimum path length (MPL) [23,24], however, has a huge computation burden, and its accuracy varies with latitude.…”
Section: Gnss Ro Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall smoothness and uniformity of the ocean allows for the identification of a single specular reflection point at the minimum path difference between the transmitter, surface and receiver using a WGS84 ellipsoidal representation of the Earth, corrected for the mean sea surface height [17]. This technique often works well for flat land surfaces whose heights are not far from the WGS84 approximation [18].…”
Section: Surface Criteria For Forward Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where S W84 lat ,lon is a vector from the Earth center to the WGS84 ellipsoid position at an offset latitude (lat ) and longitude (lon ) [17], and ∆H is the DEM height above the WGS84 ellipsoid at the offset latitude and longitude. The local surface delay difference map (δτ) is produced using Equation (4) for a grid extending 100 km in all compass directions from the center reference in steps of 1 km.…”
Section: Local Surface Delay Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper presents an algorithm for predicting GNSS-R reflection points in the presence of topography, which has been specifically designed for operational use onboard a small satellite. A recent paper by Gleason [11] has introduced a similar specular point prediction algorithm, developed independently, which includes the addition of a surface height term; however this is stated to only account for "low-lying land" and an operational limit is not given. In addition the algorithm in question was developed for a software receiver and although the paper mentions the possibility of its use on-board a reflectometry instrument, the actual implementation is not discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%