“…Such a sample period allows us to cover the longest possible high-frequency (monthly) data available for gold, and the associated predictive impact of various historical global and country-specific geopolitical risk, and in the process makes our analysis immune to any sample-selection bias (Hollstein et al, 2021). Our paper can be considered to add to the relatively large literature associated with the forecasting gold-market developments based on a wide array of macroeconomic, financial, and behavioral predictors that rely on a large spectrum of linear and nonlinear univariate or multivariate models (see, for example, Pierdzioch et al, 2014aPierdzioch et al, , 2014bPierdzioch et al, , 2015aPierdzioch et al, , 2015bPierdzioch et al, , 2016aPierdzioch et al, , 2020a2020b;Aye et al, 2015;Hassani et al, 2015;Sharma, 2016;Bonato et al, 2018;Nguyen et al, 2019;Dichtl, 2020, with the last paper in particular providing a detailed review). Our paper goes beyond this earlier research in that we use the information content of country-level disaggregate geopolitical risk.…”