2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A real-time quantile-regression approach to forecasting gold returns under asymmetric loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using data for major gold-producing countries, we have shown that a novel nonparametric causality-in-quantiles test provides new insights into the in-sample causal links between gold-price fluctuations and exchange-rate movements in both their first and second moments. In future research, it is interesting to extend our analysis to a out-of-sample forecasting context, since in-sample predictability does not guarantee the same over the out-ofsample (Bonaccolto et al, 2015; on out-of-sample forecasting of gold-price fluctuations using variants of quantile-regression techniques, see also Pierdzioch et al 2015Pierdzioch et al , 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using data for major gold-producing countries, we have shown that a novel nonparametric causality-in-quantiles test provides new insights into the in-sample causal links between gold-price fluctuations and exchange-rate movements in both their first and second moments. In future research, it is interesting to extend our analysis to a out-of-sample forecasting context, since in-sample predictability does not guarantee the same over the out-ofsample (Bonaccolto et al, 2015; on out-of-sample forecasting of gold-price fluctuations using variants of quantile-regression techniques, see also Pierdzioch et al 2015Pierdzioch et al , 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a sample period allows us to cover the longest possible high-frequency (monthly) data available for gold, and the associated predictive impact of various historical global and country-specific geopolitical risk, and in the process makes our analysis immune to any sample-selection bias (Hollstein et al, 2021). Our paper can be considered to add to the relatively large literature associated with the forecasting gold-market developments based on a wide array of macroeconomic, financial, and behavioral predictors that rely on a large spectrum of linear and nonlinear univariate or multivariate models (see, for example, Pierdzioch et al, 2014aPierdzioch et al, , 2014bPierdzioch et al, , 2015aPierdzioch et al, , 2015bPierdzioch et al, , 2016aPierdzioch et al, , 2020a2020b;Aye et al, 2015;Hassani et al, 2015;Sharma, 2016;Bonato et al, 2018;Nguyen et al, 2019;Dichtl, 2020, with the last paper in particular providing a detailed review). Our paper goes beyond this earlier research in that we use the information content of country-level disaggregate geopolitical risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%