generates free-radical chemical species that cause various skin diseases such as inflammatory disorders, aging, and skin cancer. [2] With recent advances in smart health care technology, the demand for transparent and flexible UV sensors that can be integrated into portable or wearable devices is rapidly growing for numerous potential applications, including smart watches/bands, smart glasses, and patchable devices. [3][4][5] However, Si-based UV sensors, the most established commercial sensors, are unsuitable for use in such applications because of their lack of mechanical flexibility and optical transparency and their need for high operating voltage and a long-pass filter to block low energy photons. [6] To overcome these shortcomings, nanomaterial-based UV sensors have been extensively studied. [7][8][9][10] 1D and 2D semiconducting materials such as ZnO, TiO 2 , GaTe, and MoS 2 are promising candidates for photodetection because of their direct bandgap at room temperature, transparency in the visible region, and mechanical flexibility. [11][12][13][14] Accordingly, those materials have been used for the active component of sensitive, transparent, and flexible UV sensors. [15][16][17][18][19] The UV sensors based on nanomaterials generally show high-performance in terms of photoresponsivity and response/recovery time, but most of them still rely on intrinsically opaque metal electrodes. [15,16] Although a few works have reported UV sensors where all the active or passive components were transparent, [17,18] the brittle electrode (e.g., indium tin oxide; ITO) limits the flexibility of the sensor, since ITO easily fractures under a strain of only 1%. [20] To achieve both optical transparency and mechanical flexibility, all the components of the UV sensor must be transparent and flexible. In addition, contact resistance between the photoactive material and the electrodes is a significant factor influencing the performance of UV sensors and must be considered in order to induce an effective charge transfer from the photoactive material to the electrodes. [21,22] This implies that selection of both photoresponsive and electrode materials would regulate the overall photoresponse as well as transparency and flexibility of the UV sensor.One of the promising alternatives is a combination of carbon nanomaterials, including 1D carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and