2010
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A realist evaluation of the management of a well- performing regional hospital in Ghana

Abstract: BackgroundRealist evaluation offers an interesting approach to evaluation of interventions in complex settings, but has been little applied in health care. We report on a realist case study of a well performing hospital in Ghana and show how such a realist evaluation design can help to overcome the limited external validity of a traditional case study.MethodsWe developed a realist evaluation framework for hypothesis formulation, data collection, data analysis and synthesis of the findings. Focusing on the role… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
141
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
141
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Burton et al (2006) have proposed this approach to evaluate public participation; they consider its potential in bringing to the surface key assumptions about how public participation is expected to make a difference. The appropriateness of this realist approach has been demonstrated by its use in the evaluation of complex systems such as complicated interventions and programs (Marchal et al 2010). This fairly new approach to literature synthesis has been increasingly used to understand programs or interventions, with the primary argument that no one particular intervention fits all situations because of its contextual dependence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burton et al (2006) have proposed this approach to evaluate public participation; they consider its potential in bringing to the surface key assumptions about how public participation is expected to make a difference. The appropriateness of this realist approach has been demonstrated by its use in the evaluation of complex systems such as complicated interventions and programs (Marchal et al 2010). This fairly new approach to literature synthesis has been increasingly used to understand programs or interventions, with the primary argument that no one particular intervention fits all situations because of its contextual dependence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realist evaluation has been used in a wide range of healthcare evaluations including individual healthcare interventions aimed at patient/practitioner behaviours (Rycroft-Malone et al, 2010, Fairhurst et al 2005, Tolson et al, 2007, local-level changes to healthcare delivery (Wand et al, 2011, Marchal et al, 2010, Byng et al, 2005 and large scale programmes of health service change (Greenhalgh et al, 2009, Evans & Killoran, 2000, Kennedy et al, 2005. This approach to evaluation has resulted in deeper insights into why a programme/intervention did or did not work and what contextual factors were associated with outcomes.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach to evaluation has resulted in deeper insights into why a programme/intervention did or did not work and what contextual factors were associated with outcomes. Through its focus on understanding why change occurs (or not) and in which conditions, realist evaluation allows decision-makers to draw transferrable lessons about effective implementation strategies, thereby lending greater external validity to the findings (Marchal et al, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…326 This may help the researcher to elucidate what might work for whom and in what clinical context. Realist evaluation is an emerging area of enquiry that has strong potential for informing research questions that take into account the different contexts of delivery on health-care innovation and interventions, and show scope for refined approaches to process evaluation in applied health-care research 327,328 and training. 327,329,330 Challenging behaviour in dementia care home and family care settings: a comparison of clinical presentations…”
Section: Overview Of Key Findings From Challenge Demcarementioning
confidence: 99%