1986
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reanalysis of Particle Motion in Sieve Tubes of Heracleum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…starch grains from disrupted SE plastids) in sieve tubes and concluded that the viscosity is much higher than that of a 20% sucrose solution. Murphy (1986) reanalysed these data and argued that Barclay & Johnson (1982) had underestimated the degree of motion, and that they had studied severed, non‐functional sieve tubes (indicated by the disruption of SE plastids). He concluded that the viscosity was below 3 × 10 −3 Pa s −1 .…”
Section: Viscosity – Does the Cargo Control Its Own Transport Rate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…starch grains from disrupted SE plastids) in sieve tubes and concluded that the viscosity is much higher than that of a 20% sucrose solution. Murphy (1986) reanalysed these data and argued that Barclay & Johnson (1982) had underestimated the degree of motion, and that they had studied severed, non‐functional sieve tubes (indicated by the disruption of SE plastids). He concluded that the viscosity was below 3 × 10 −3 Pa s −1 .…”
Section: Viscosity – Does the Cargo Control Its Own Transport Rate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fensom et al (1968) estimated a streaming rate of about 1 cm h -1 . Other studies have been conducted, mainly at Mount Alliston University in Sackville NB, using H. mantegazzianum as a research tool to elucidate the underlying forces governing mass flow (Tyree and Fensom 1970;Spanner 1970), determine the nature of particles observed in phloem (Lee et al 1971;Hart and Sabnis 1975;Barclay et al 1977;Murphy 1986), and gain further insight into energy transfers in active phloem (Ezeala et al 1974).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%