2020
DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2019.1663070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reappraisal of contemporary homelessness policy: the new role for transitional housing programmes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cada vez son más los trabajos empíricos que señalan efectos positivos y relevantes en aspectos económicos vinculados al modelo Housing First, tanto en términos absolutos, como en relación con otros servicios alternativos (Gilmer et al, 2010;Johnson, Parkinson y Parsell, 2012;Ly y Latimer, 2015). La evidencia de la efectividad del modelo para hacer frente al sinhogarismo es consistente (Pleace, 2018;Pleace y Bretherton, 2019), en particular para personas con necesidades más acusadas o complejas (Pleace, 2016;Williams, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Cada vez son más los trabajos empíricos que señalan efectos positivos y relevantes en aspectos económicos vinculados al modelo Housing First, tanto en términos absolutos, como en relación con otros servicios alternativos (Gilmer et al, 2010;Johnson, Parkinson y Parsell, 2012;Ly y Latimer, 2015). La evidencia de la efectividad del modelo para hacer frente al sinhogarismo es consistente (Pleace, 2018;Pleace y Bretherton, 2019), en particular para personas con necesidades más acusadas o complejas (Pleace, 2016;Williams, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…One problematic aspect regarding the extension of the HF model is that the scientific evidence on the financial aspect continues to be limited (Johnson et al, 2012; NASEM, 2018; Williams, 2020). There is a need to continue emphasising the usefulness of performing additional and more in‐depth research that makes it possible to identify the potential for this type of programme to help solve the homeless problem in an effective and efficient way (Busch‐Geertsema, 2012; Busch‐Geertsema, 2013; Doberstein & Smith, 2019; Pleace, 2016; Pleace et al, 2019; Wright & Peasgood, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence on the effectiveness of HF in addressing homelessness is consistent (Pleace, 2018; Pleace & Bretherton, 2013; Pleace & Bretherton, 2019), particularly for people with more pronounced or complex needs associated with mental health and/or substance abuse issues (Pleace, 2016; Pleace et al, 2019; Williams, 2020). Since the main objective of HF is to resolve the homelessness situation, the most studied aspects usually relate to accommodation, which shows the greatest degree of consistency across different programmes, countries and contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence of the effectiveness of the HF model to address homelessness is consistent (Pleace, 2018; Pleace & Bretherton, 2019), particularly for people with more pronounced or complex needs associated with mental health problems and/or substance use (Pleace, 2016; Williams, 2020). The main objective of HF is to bring an end to homelessness; therefore, accommodation enhancement has been the most studied aspect and much evidence on the HF's positive effect in this regard has been reported across different programs, countries, and contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%