1977
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197708000-00079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reappraisal of the Pfannenstiel incision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of incisional hernias following a Pfannenstiel incision is 0.04-2.1% [9,10] and that following midline laparotomy is up to 46% [9,11,12]. Midline vertical incisions are generally more prone to develop incisional hernias than paramedian incisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of incisional hernias following a Pfannenstiel incision is 0.04-2.1% [9,10] and that following midline laparotomy is up to 46% [9,11,12]. Midline vertical incisions are generally more prone to develop incisional hernias than paramedian incisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary authors cite a 0.04-2.1% rate of incisional hernia after using the Pfannenstiel incision [5,12]. There is a paucity of data regarding the technical aspects of the repair of suprapubic ventral hernias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%