Consciousness and Self-Regulation 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9317-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reason for Doubting the Existence of Consciousness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 This early attempt at a one-level theory was rejected by early higher-order theorists, but I will argue that this was a mistake, because the reasons for the shift in fact provided no real motivation for preferring genuinely higher-order theories. Moreover, higher-order views have recently come under attack (Rey 1983, Block 1997, Dretske 1997 (originally published in 1993, and face competition from one-level representational theories of consciousness (Dretske 1995). Thus it seems we have good reason to reconsider one-level views of consciousness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 This early attempt at a one-level theory was rejected by early higher-order theorists, but I will argue that this was a mistake, because the reasons for the shift in fact provided no real motivation for preferring genuinely higher-order theories. Moreover, higher-order views have recently come under attack (Rey 1983, Block 1997, Dretske 1997 (originally published in 1993, and face competition from one-level representational theories of consciousness (Dretske 1995). Thus it seems we have good reason to reconsider one-level views of consciousness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…these interpretations are remarkably similar to the radical behaviourist deniers of consciousness as epiphenomenal who are opposed to dualism and want to focus on the causation of consciousness by brains and the nervous system as caused biologically, electrically and electrochemically (Churchland 1981;dennett 2001;rey 1983;wegner 2002) and deny the natural attitude as a suitable starting point for clarifying consciousness and intersubjective meaning (hood 2011). if their criticisms were limited to only stating that the natural attitude doesn't know the scientific truth of how vision works, or how the ego moves its hand according to electrical studies of brain during the exercise of free will, then that would be no different to any science stating its outcomes.…”
Section: Problem: How To Bridge Dualism When Consciousness Is Deniedmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Carruthers (2000) worries that it seems that a Higher Order mechanism would demand a large amount of cognitive resources (as a person's awareness can be quite complex at times), in which case it's difficult to see how animals, or perhaps even small children, can have the resources needed for awareness. Further, Rey (1983) claims that if all that is needed for awareness is the monitoring of internal states, then many technological devices qualify for awareness, as they, too, monitor their own states, and it seems absurd to confer awareness on a relatively simplistic technological device. White (1987) and Lycan (1996) have responded to this worry.…”
Section: The Higher Order Representational Theories Of Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 98%