“…The rates and spatiotemporal distribution of deformation within the outer forearc of subduction zones have provided important insights into processes fundamental to how mass is distributed within subduction zone systems (e.g., Allmendinger et al, ; Clift et al, ; Dominguez et al, ; Laursen et al, ; Ranero & von Huene, ; von Huene & Scholl, ; von Huene & Ranero, ). Over the last three decades, the forearc of the nonaccretionary convergent margin at Costa Rica (Figure ) has served as the focus of numerous investigations to understand the role of subducting bathymetry and a thinly sedimented plate on forearc evolution, including the Costa Rica Seismogenesis Project (CRISP) drilling expeditions (Harris et al, ; Vannucchi et al, ), onland field studies (Buchs et al, , ; Corrigan et al, ; Denyer et al, ; Gardner et al, , ; Fisher et al, , ; Vannucchi et al, ; Marshall & Anderson, ; Morell et al, ), and geophysical surveys (Bangs et al, ; Edwards et al, ; Hinz, ; McIntosh et al, ; Moore & Sender, ; Morell et al, ; Ranero & von Huene, ; von Huene et al, , ). Despite the voluminous data sets on outer forearc structure, subsidence history, and a record of slope sedimentation, there is no agreement on the processes that have shaped the Costa Rican outer forearc throughout the Plio‐Quaternary, such as the relative roles of basal erosion (e.g., Vannucchi et al, ; von Huene et al, ; Vannucchi, Morgan, Silver, et al, ; Vannucchi, Morgan & Balestrieri, ), shortening (e.g., Taylor et al, ), and surface exhumation (e.g., Edwards et al, ).…”