1971
DOI: 10.5840/dspp197118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reciprocal Participation Model of Experimentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical phenomenological approach was the subject of many of the methodological articles reviewed. Topics of discussion included: the researcher's use of the subjects' accounts to help define the experience under consideration (e.g., Giorgi, 1983); the importance of articulating or questioning the researcher's initial assumptions, and the question of the extent to which suspension of these is possible (e.g., Keen, 1975, p. 148; Collaizi, 1978a; Fouche, 1984); the use of free imaginative variation (e.g., Aanstoos, 1983; Wertz, 1983) the need for mutual respect and cooperation between the researcher and the volunteer (Kvale, 1983); the possible value of particular instructions, or contexts such as experimental settings, for eliciting descriptions (e.g., Barrell & Barrell, 1975; Giorgi, 1971; Aanstoos, 1983); the value of written versus oral accounts of experiences (van Kaam, 1958; Giorgi, 1975; Sardello, 1971a), the extent to which the volunteer ought to be invited to interpret his or her own experience (Sardello, 1971a; Giorgi, 1989a; Kvale, 1983), and the role of validation (Shapiro, 1986; Wertz, 1986; Sardello, 1971a).…”
Section: Methods and Methodology In Current Phenomenological Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The empirical phenomenological approach was the subject of many of the methodological articles reviewed. Topics of discussion included: the researcher's use of the subjects' accounts to help define the experience under consideration (e.g., Giorgi, 1983); the importance of articulating or questioning the researcher's initial assumptions, and the question of the extent to which suspension of these is possible (e.g., Keen, 1975, p. 148; Collaizi, 1978a; Fouche, 1984); the use of free imaginative variation (e.g., Aanstoos, 1983; Wertz, 1983) the need for mutual respect and cooperation between the researcher and the volunteer (Kvale, 1983); the possible value of particular instructions, or contexts such as experimental settings, for eliciting descriptions (e.g., Barrell & Barrell, 1975; Giorgi, 1971; Aanstoos, 1983); the value of written versus oral accounts of experiences (van Kaam, 1958; Giorgi, 1975; Sardello, 1971a), the extent to which the volunteer ought to be invited to interpret his or her own experience (Sardello, 1971a; Giorgi, 1989a; Kvale, 1983), and the role of validation (Shapiro, 1986; Wertz, 1986; Sardello, 1971a).…”
Section: Methods and Methodology In Current Phenomenological Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hermeneutic movement in phenomenological psychology has resulted in a tension over final authority in determining the meaning of the subject's experience. This tension manifests itself in extensive discussion over how differences between the interpretation by the subject and by the researcher are to be resolved (e.g., Sardello, 1971a; Giorgi, 1983; Kvale, 1983; Aanstoos, 1983).…”
Section: A Critical Comparison Of Methods In Husserlian and Contempor...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robert Sardello (1971), in a paper on research in phenomenological psychology, wrote, "The most primordial meaning of objectivity is an attitude of respectful openness to the whole of our existence, which allows, through our involvement in the world, reality to reveal itself the way it is" (p. 64). This faith in the importance and usefulness of seeing the facts of the world realistically was certainly endorsed by Berne.…”
Section: Engaged Researchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy can actually be used in conjunction with any kind of investigative or experimental procedure. Sardello (1971), for example, recommended obtaining transcripts of the entire encounter with the subject. Not only is the transcript then used by the experimenter to discern the meaning of the experience for the subject, but the transcript is also reviewed collaboratively with the subject to determine if the explicated meaning of the phenomenon can also be seen by the subject.…”
Section: Postassessment Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 99%