“…The empirical phenomenological approach was the subject of many of the methodological articles reviewed. Topics of discussion included: the researcher's use of the subjects' accounts to help define the experience under consideration (e.g., Giorgi, 1983); the importance of articulating or questioning the researcher's initial assumptions, and the question of the extent to which suspension of these is possible (e.g., Keen, 1975, p. 148; Collaizi, 1978a; Fouche, 1984); the use of free imaginative variation (e.g., Aanstoos, 1983; Wertz, 1983) the need for mutual respect and cooperation between the researcher and the volunteer (Kvale, 1983); the possible value of particular instructions, or contexts such as experimental settings, for eliciting descriptions (e.g., Barrell & Barrell, 1975; Giorgi, 1971; Aanstoos, 1983); the value of written versus oral accounts of experiences (van Kaam, 1958; Giorgi, 1975; Sardello, 1971a), the extent to which the volunteer ought to be invited to interpret his or her own experience (Sardello, 1971a; Giorgi, 1989a; Kvale, 1983), and the role of validation (Shapiro, 1986; Wertz, 1986; Sardello, 1971a).…”