2016
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reconnection-Driven Model of the Hard X-Ray Loop-Top Source From Flare 2004 February 26

Abstract: A reconnection-driven model of the hard X-ray loop-top source from flare 2004-Feb-26 Dana Longcope 1 , Jiong Qiu 1 , and Jasmine Brewer ABSTRACT A compact X-class flare on 2004-Feb-26 showed a concentrated source of hard X-rays at the tops of the flare's loops. This was analyzed in previous work , and interpreted as plasma heated and compressed by slow magnetosonic shocks generated during post-reconnection retraction of the flux. That work used analytic expressions from a thin flux tube (TFT) model, which n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A coronal origin, from thermal 30-50 MK gas, may also be possible but generating the requisite gas density is challenging. For example, Caspi & Lin (2010) also found two components of X-ray continuum emission in an energetic (X4.8) solar flare: a superhot (T e > 30 MK) component, likely due to direct coronal heating and compression during the magnetic reconnection process (Longcope & Guidoni 2011;Longcope et al 2016), and a hot (T e 25 MK) component that they attributed to chromospheric evaporation. However, an extension of their model spectra to the FUV predicts F 1142 = 5 × 10 −17 erg cm −2 s −1 Å−1 , a factor of ∼20 below the observed FUV flux.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A coronal origin, from thermal 30-50 MK gas, may also be possible but generating the requisite gas density is challenging. For example, Caspi & Lin (2010) also found two components of X-ray continuum emission in an energetic (X4.8) solar flare: a superhot (T e > 30 MK) component, likely due to direct coronal heating and compression during the magnetic reconnection process (Longcope & Guidoni 2011;Longcope et al 2016), and a hot (T e 25 MK) component that they attributed to chromospheric evaporation. However, an extension of their model spectra to the FUV predicts F 1142 = 5 × 10 −17 erg cm −2 s −1 Å−1 , a factor of ∼20 below the observed FUV flux.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Direct in situ heating of plasma at loop tops has been suggested as necessary to explain certain flare observations (e.g. Battaglia et al 2009 suggest that energy release from reconnection (Cheung et al 2019) and retraction of flare loops (Longcope & Klimchuk 2015;Longcope et al 2016Longcope et al , 2018 can deposit energy at the loop tops. This energy would then be transported to the lower atmosphere via the conductive flux.…”
Section: Flares Driven By Thermal Conductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal conduction occurs strictly along the field line and drives evaporation from a chromosphere orders of magnitude denser and cooler than the corona. These aspects of the post-reconnection dynamics are essential in making comparisons to flare observations, which are often dominated by evaporated plasma (Longcope et al 2016). Most significantly, under the TFT model, the flaring loop is energized by the magnetic energy released by retraction of the postreconnection flux tube.…”
Section: Transient Patchy Reconnection In Three Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%