1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(86)80056-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A recording dilatometer for measuring polymerization shrinkage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
18
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was made possible by accurately controlling the sample thickness by fastening the shield on the glass under constant pressure. When the linear shrinkages are converted to percentage of volumetric shrinkage (Table 3) according to the methods by de Gee et al [4], they ranged between 1.88% (Tetric Ceram) and 2.53% (Herculite XRV), which is within the range of the previous reports [1][2][3][4]6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was made possible by accurately controlling the sample thickness by fastening the shield on the glass under constant pressure. When the linear shrinkages are converted to percentage of volumetric shrinkage (Table 3) according to the methods by de Gee et al [4], they ranged between 1.88% (Tetric Ceram) and 2.53% (Herculite XRV), which is within the range of the previous reports [1][2][3][4]6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The polymerization shrinkage of dental composites can be measured by several methods: mercury or water dilatometer [1][2][3]; the linometer [4] or by measuring the specific gravity differences between uncured and cured composite samples [5]. The use of a linometer has merits such as simple and easy application, and it is unaffected by temperature [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modified dilatometer [13][14][15] used in this study eliminated the significant attenuation of the curing light by the density bottle. This was possible because specimens were lightirradiated through a cover glass of merely 0.5 mm thickness, and the reduction of power density through the cover glass was estimated to be very small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of various volumetric measuring techniques are the mercury dilatometer, water dilatometer, linear techniques and the pycnometer. A disadvantage with the utilization of dilatometers is that they are extremely sensitive to variations in temperature [14,19]. Oberholzer et al, [15] described a specially designed electronically controlled mercury dilatometer which measured change in volume of the sample every 0.5 seconds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%