2012
DOI: 10.3138/infor.50.3.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Recourse Goal Programming Approach for the Portfolio Selection Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ben Abdelaziz () presented an overview of solution approaches for multi‐objective stochastic programming problems, where he classified these approaches into two different groups: stochastic transformations and multi‐objective transformations. The stochastic transformation eliminates the randomness of the problem with a chance‐constrained approach (Ben Abdelaziz and Masri, ) or a recourse approach (Masmoudi and Ben Abdelaziz, ). A multi‐objective transformation deals with the multi‐objective aspect of the problem by transforming several objectives into a single one using, for example, a goal‐programming approach (Park and Koelling, ; Ghoseiri and Ghannadopour, ; Calavete et al ., ; Ben Abdelaziz et al ., ) or a weighted‐sum approach (Gass and Saaty, ).…”
Section: The Certainty Equivalentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ben Abdelaziz () presented an overview of solution approaches for multi‐objective stochastic programming problems, where he classified these approaches into two different groups: stochastic transformations and multi‐objective transformations. The stochastic transformation eliminates the randomness of the problem with a chance‐constrained approach (Ben Abdelaziz and Masri, ) or a recourse approach (Masmoudi and Ben Abdelaziz, ). A multi‐objective transformation deals with the multi‐objective aspect of the problem by transforming several objectives into a single one using, for example, a goal‐programming approach (Park and Koelling, ; Ghoseiri and Ghannadopour, ; Calavete et al ., ; Ben Abdelaziz et al ., ) or a weighted‐sum approach (Gass and Saaty, ).…”
Section: The Certainty Equivalentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [15] proposed the extended factors of stocks and applied goal programming for portfolio selection. They applied three alternatives of goal programming namely weighted, lexicographic and minimax approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors assumed that the securities return are random and are normally distributed. Masmoudi and Abdelaziz (2012) proposed the recourse goal programming approach, which is a mix of the goal programming approach and the recourse approach to solve the portfolio problem when multiple stochastic objectives are involved. They assumed that, investors have a minimum acceptable expected rate of return of their portfolio that if they do not achieve the minimum acceptable return then, they have to pay penalty.…”
Section: Research Problem and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%