2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A recursive least square algorithm for active control of mixed noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be the reason that recent work on ANC of impulsive sources (being modeled as stable process) does not include the theoretical analysis, and in fact, the simulations have been used as a major tool to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposal (see, for example, [7,8,11]). The interested reader may also look into the recent works on ANC [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Though simulations do not prove, they do demonstrate the effectiveness.…”
Section: Performance Analysis and Computational Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be the reason that recent work on ANC of impulsive sources (being modeled as stable process) does not include the theoretical analysis, and in fact, the simulations have been used as a major tool to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposal (see, for example, [7,8,11]). The interested reader may also look into the recent works on ANC [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Though simulations do not prove, they do demonstrate the effectiveness.…”
Section: Performance Analysis and Computational Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FxGAL algorithm using the lattice form to orthogonalize correlated inputs shows better performance and lower computational complexity than the FxAP algorithm. However, as the regression coefficients are updated by a stochastic gradient approach such as the normalized least mean square (NLMS) algorithm, the performance of the FxGAL algorithm cannot reach that of the filtered-input recursive least-squares (FxRLS) algorithm based on a least-square estimation [18]- [21]. Although the FxRLS algorithm shows the best performance among all aforementioned algorithms, it has not been applied to ANC systems owing to its high computational complexity of O(M 2 ) operations per iteration [22], where M is the tap length of the filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the LMS-based algorithms [21,22], the VFxMCC algorithm uses the gradient descent theory to update the weight vector. Moreover, the weight coefficient updating mode of VFxRMC algorithm is parallel to the recursive least square (RLS) based algorithms [23][24][25]. In order to further improve algorithm performance, we use the VFxRMC algorithm to update the 1st-order SOV filter coefficient and the 2nd-order SOV filter coefficient is updated by VFxMCC algorithm, which is called the hybrid (HVFx-RMC-MCC) algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%