2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2006.06.1563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A redetermination of the isotopic abundances of atmospheric Ar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
611
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,090 publications
(671 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
32
611
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Discrimination is monitored by analysing splits of atmospheric Ar from a reservoir attached to the extraction line and for these samples D1amu ¼ 1.007504±0.000279. All isotopic ratios are mass discrimination corrected using 40 35) is more precise, but acceptance is controversial and that ratio has no impact on this study because normalizing to a different value does not change the age 36 . Typical system blanks including mass spectrometer backgrounds were 1.5 Â 10 À 18 mol of m/z 36, 9 Â 10 À 17 mol of m/z 37, 3 Â 10 À 18 mol of m/z 39 and 1.5 Â 10 À 16 mol of m/z 40, where m/z is mass/ charge ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrimination is monitored by analysing splits of atmospheric Ar from a reservoir attached to the extraction line and for these samples D1amu ¼ 1.007504±0.000279. All isotopic ratios are mass discrimination corrected using 40 35) is more precise, but acceptance is controversial and that ratio has no impact on this study because normalizing to a different value does not change the age 36 . Typical system blanks including mass spectrometer backgrounds were 1.5 Â 10 À 18 mol of m/z 36, 9 Â 10 À 17 mol of m/z 37, 3 Â 10 À 18 mol of m/z 39 and 1.5 Â 10 À 16 mol of m/z 40, where m/z is mass/ charge ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ratios listed in Table 2 were calculated under the assumption that the atmospheric 36 Ar/ 38 Ar = 5.305 (Lee et al, 2006). Interestingly, Genesis SW-Ar analyses agree better among themselves than the measurements of atmospheric 36 Ar/ 38 Ar (Mark et al, 2011 and Refs.…”
Section: Argonmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Table 3 Argon released from PAC solar wind collector in 23-step UV laser ablation combined with subsequent pyrolysis of the laser-ablated area. Atmospheric contamination and blank were removed assuming both have isotopic composition of atmospheric argon (Lee et al, 2006). "R" indicates repeated extraction with the same laser power.…”
Section: Fig 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Atm." indicates modern-day atmosphere (Lee et al, 2006). Uncertainties are two-sigma, and include the uncertainty in J and decay constants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data regression was undertaken in MassSpec version 8.131. Mass spectrometer discrimination was calculated per AMU using the power law, the average 40 Ar/ 36 Ar value from all air pipette analyses ( 40 Ar/ 36 Ar of 296.89 ± 0.99, 1 standard deviation, n = 85), and an atmospheric 40 Ar/ 36 Ar value of 298.56 ± 0.31 (Lee et al, 2006) which has been independently confirmed by Mark et al (2011). We have used the Alder Creek sanidine age of 1.1891 ± 0.0008 Ma (1σ uncertainty) (Niespolo et al, in press) and the potassium decay constants reported by Renne et al (2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%