2000
DOI: 10.1086/301353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Redetermination of the Mass of Procyon

Abstract: The parallax and astrometric orbit of Procyon have been redetermined from PDS measurements of over 250 photographic plates spanning 83 years, with roughly 600 exposures used in the solution. These data are combined with two modern measurements of the primaryÈwhite dwarf separation, one utilizing a ground-based coronagraph, the other, the Planetary Camera (PC) of the Hubble Space T elescope. Together with the redetermined astrometric orbit and parallax, these yield new estimates of the component masses. The der… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The derived gravity is in good agreement with the estimate of Allende Prieto & Lambert (1999), log g = 4.04 ± 0.14 dex, obtained from matching the observed M V and (B − V ) to the evolutionary models of Bertelli et al (1994) 5 . Our mass estimate is slightly lower from that given in Girard et al (2000), as we prefer to adopt the Hipparcos parallax and the angular separation determined from HST-WFPC2 observations, discarding the ground-based measurement. Adopting the parallax derived by Girard et al, p = (283.2 ± 1.5) × 10 −3 arcsec, we find only a minor correction to the derived mass:…”
Section: Fundamental Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The derived gravity is in good agreement with the estimate of Allende Prieto & Lambert (1999), log g = 4.04 ± 0.14 dex, obtained from matching the observed M V and (B − V ) to the evolutionary models of Bertelli et al (1994) 5 . Our mass estimate is slightly lower from that given in Girard et al (2000), as we prefer to adopt the Hipparcos parallax and the angular separation determined from HST-WFPC2 observations, discarding the ground-based measurement. Adopting the parallax derived by Girard et al, p = (283.2 ± 1.5) × 10 −3 arcsec, we find only a minor correction to the derived mass:…”
Section: Fundamental Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…where α, α A , and P are the semi-major axis of the visual orbit or Procyon A, the semi-major axis of its orbit relative to the barycenter of the system, and the orbital period, respectively, and for which we have adopted α = 4.271 ± 0.032 arcsec, α A = 1.232 ± 0.08 arcsec, and P = 40.82 ± 0.06 yr. (Girard et al 2000), in combination with Hipparcos's parallax. The radius is…”
Section: Fundamental Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They disagreed on the derived mass. Eggenberger et al found a mass that agrees well with the astrometric value derived by Girard et al (2000), whereas Provost et al found a mass that corresponds to the more recent value of Gatewood & Han (2006). Part of the reason for the difference in the two stellar evolution models comes from the slightly different large separation (which increases with the mass), and is partly due to the difference in the stellar evolution codes themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The proper motions of known pairs in the HIP are reduced to the photocentre, barycentre or components separately, depending on the results of the mission. In Table 2 the barycentric proper motion taken or calculated from the HIP is marked as m whereas the photocentric one is marked as p. The Hipparcos proper motion of Procyon was recalculated by Girard et al (2000) in a combination of Hipparcos and ground-based data.…”
Section: Comparison With Known Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photocentric orbits by Strand (1951), Irwin et al (1992) and Girard et al (2000) are shown in Fig. 2 as dashed, • 3 104.…”
Section: α CMI (Procyon)mentioning
confidence: 99%