2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reduced modal subspace approach for damped stochastic dynamic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods that combine PC‐based stochastic finite element analyses with deterministic and stochastic reduced‐order methods are developed in Reference 39, where deterministic/stochastic reduced bases are obtained by using deterministic/stochastic Krylov subspace techniques. In Reference 40, a high‐order perturbation technique coupled with reduced modal subspaces is developed to solve stochastic dynamic systems, which exhibits better performance than the classical perturbation methods. The spline chaos expansion (SCE) and the spline dimensional decomposition (SDD) methods are proposed in Reference 41 for stochastic modal analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods that combine PC‐based stochastic finite element analyses with deterministic and stochastic reduced‐order methods are developed in Reference 39, where deterministic/stochastic reduced bases are obtained by using deterministic/stochastic Krylov subspace techniques. In Reference 40, a high‐order perturbation technique coupled with reduced modal subspaces is developed to solve stochastic dynamic systems, which exhibits better performance than the classical perturbation methods. The spline chaos expansion (SCE) and the spline dimensional decomposition (SDD) methods are proposed in Reference 41 for stochastic modal analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with H ∞ optimization mechanism, another optimization method is concerned with deriving mathematical closed-form expressions for the damper’s optimal design parameters, called H 2 optimization, applicable for randomly excited dynamic systems (Adhikari et al, 2016; Chowdhury et al, 2022b; Khodaparast et al, 2008; Palmeri and Lombardo, 2011). An immense study was conducted on the TMD to mitigate the dynamic responses of automotive suspension systems, offshore platforms, buildings, and bridges with different solution procedures, analytical and numerical (Adhikari and Bhattacharya, 2012; Batou and Adhikari, 2019; Kasinos et al, 2021). The vibration reduction performance of TMD was amplified through a conventional approach, increasing the static mass of the damper, causing increasing the dead load, and affecting collapse during any seismic events with the presence of the damper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Successively, this improved perturbation method has been used in various contexts, for example, in the stochastic dynamic analysis of uncertain systems 12 or in the definition of new mode subspace definition. 13 All the above perturbation approaches are characterized by an accuracy that is strictly related to the level of uncertainties of the input RV, moreover, the computation effort of these approaches increases with higher orders of perturbation. In order to overcome the drawbacks related to the use of the above-mentioned approaches, in the last years, an approach working directly on the input-output PDFs, in the context of the probabilistic transformation method (PTM), has been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some years ago, it was proposed the so‐called “improved” perturbation approach which considers mean and correlation information on uncertain parameters in computing the mathematical expectation of the response 11 . Successively, this improved perturbation method has been used in various contexts, for example, in the stochastic dynamic analysis of uncertain systems 12 or in the definition of new mode subspace definition 13 . All the above perturbation approaches are characterized by an accuracy that is strictly related to the level of uncertainties of the input RV, moreover, the computation effort of these approaches increases with higher orders of perturbation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%