1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.34.2302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reduction of order two for infinite-order Lagrangians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
101
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
101
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the loop quantized model it is more complicated to introduce adiabaticity relative to free solutions because free quantum variables (27)- (32) are not simply proportional to powers of the expectation values as in the Wheeler-DeWitt case. The most direct possibility is to introduce the free solutions as explicitly time dependent functions G a,n V =0 (φ).…”
Section: Non-adiabaticity Relative To Free Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the loop quantized model it is more complicated to introduce adiabaticity relative to free solutions because free quantum variables (27)- (32) are not simply proportional to powers of the expectation values as in the Wheeler-DeWitt case. The most direct possibility is to introduce the free solutions as explicitly time dependent functions G a,n V =0 (φ).…”
Section: Non-adiabaticity Relative To Free Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the free case, its implementation resulted in selecting the cosh-solution for p and ruling out the sinh solution, proving the bounce under the assumption of a semiclassical state at large volume. (The integration constants A and B must have equal sign in (27) if c 1 is not too large and negative.) Perturbatively, the reality condition becomes…”
Section: (J +J)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An additional challenge arises because the presence of dimension five operators encoding the corrections to QED in the MP model make the theory of the HOTD type. At least at the perturbative level, it is well known that HOTD theories, besides the obvious property of having additional degrees of freedom with respect to the lower order ones, give rise to Hamiltonians which are not positive definite, irrespectively of the interaction terms [4,5]. In fact, a perturbation of electrodynamics should not introduce additional degrees of freedom, so that a careful strategy is required to define an adequate perturbative procedure in the LIV parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several problems with higher derivative theories [17,18], e.g., need for additional initial conditions in a formulation of a cauchy problem, existence of run away solutions, and whether solutions obtained from R + βR 2 gravity reduce to solutions of Einstein's gravity as β → 0. In order to resolve these issues, the author has recently proposed an alternate approach to R + βR 2 gravity in which βR 2 is treated as a backreaction on Einstein's gravity [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%