1984
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reevaluation of the structure of purified tubulin in solution: evidence for the prevalence of oligomers over dimers at room temperature.

Abstract: We studied the molecular form of tubulin in solution by ultrafiltration, nondenaturing electrophoresis, and chemical cross- linking. Our results are not consistent with the generally-held belief that tubulin in solution is a 110,000-mol-wt dimer. Rather, tubulin in solution consists of small oligomers; dimers are a minority species. The small proportion of dimers was readily apparent from ultrafiltration experiments. We first compared the filterability (defined as the ratio of protein concentration in filtrate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is also compatible with our ability to visualize by electron microscopy short filaments Ϸ10 nm in diameter in negatively stained samples of neurofilament injectate and with our inability to visualize formed microtubules in the tubulin injectate. The presumption that the tubulin was unpolymerized at the time of injection is also consistent with previous reports that tubulin exists primarily as dimers and small oligomers at room temperature (36).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This conclusion is also compatible with our ability to visualize by electron microscopy short filaments Ϸ10 nm in diameter in negatively stained samples of neurofilament injectate and with our inability to visualize formed microtubules in the tubulin injectate. The presumption that the tubulin was unpolymerized at the time of injection is also consistent with previous reports that tubulin exists primarily as dimers and small oligomers at room temperature (36).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We calculated the ratio of Stokes radius between two different oligomers of CS6 to understand the surface area of each oligomeric form. The calculated value of the ratio of Stokes radii of CS6 oligomeric species suggested a spherical shape and a molar specific volume of 0.74 cm 3 g 21 mol 21 (Rodbard & Chrambach, 1971;Kravit et al, 1984). The molecular dimensions were consistent with the Mw(s) for a series of CS6 oligomers.…”
Section: Cs6 Exists As Spherical Oligomers In Solutionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A standard curve was constructed by plotting the logarithm of calibrant relative mobility (log 10 R f ) as a function of total polyacrylamide concentration. Retardation coefficients (K R ) were then computed from the plot slope and graphed versus molecular mass (K R plot) (Kravit et al, 1984). CS6 samples were processed in the same way as the calibrants and the molecular masses were finally calculated by K R plot interpolation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spite of the difficulties associated with the electrophoresis of native proteins due to their complex shapes and small charges, they can be fractionated by electrophoresis (or by isoelectric focusing; for review see Chrambach, 1980). In particular, native gel electrophoresis allows one to measure (during the fractionation) the catalytic activity of various enzymes (Siciliano et al, 1976;Moody and Dailey, 1983;Nagy and Simon, 1983), to observe the degree of polymerization of native polymers (e.g., tubulin;Kravit et al, 1984) and to fractionate isoenzymes (e.g., myosin; Hoh et al, 1976;d'Albis et al, 1979;Takano-Ohmuro and Kohama, 1987). If it were possible to carry out the electrophoresis of native F-actin (and of a complex of F-actin with myosin fragments), one could likewise measure the activity of acto-heavy meromyosin (HMM)' (or acto-S-1 ) during the electrophoresis and one could estimate the weight (or number) distribution of F-actin sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%