2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2618-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reexamination of the existence of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: evidence from G20 countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude that the EKC hypothesis was applicable to the G20 during the period of study. This conclusion is consistent with the findings of [18][19][20]41] and against those of [21,22]. An interesting finding is the link between EKC curve, LPI, and HDI turning points in relation with CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We conclude that the EKC hypothesis was applicable to the G20 during the period of study. This conclusion is consistent with the findings of [18][19][20]41] and against those of [21,22]. An interesting finding is the link between EKC curve, LPI, and HDI turning points in relation with CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, further research from Ahmad et al ( 2019 ) showed that in China’s construction sector, it concluded the EKC hypothesis and played a significant role in increasing GHG emissions. EKC research with industrial sector proxies (including manufacturing) was carried out among others by Asghar et al ( 2019 ) in 13 Asian countries; Hao et al ( 2016 ) in China; Luo et al ( 2017 ) in G20 countries; and Nguyen et al ( 2019b ) in emerging economies. In all of these publications, it was concluded that the industry has positive effects on GHG emissions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, however, that economic development also causes greenhouse gas emissions, which has led some researchers to include environmental indicators in the causal relationship analysis mentioned above [16][17][18]. Some researchers have studied the correlation between GDP or GDP per capita with GHG [19][20][21]. The correlation between economic growth, energy intensity and CO 2 reduction was studied [22], demonstrating a positive impact on the standard of living [23].…”
Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For European countries, we found quite few such studies. For Spain, the relations between per capita CO 2 emissions and per capita income was studied, and an inverted U-shaped form was obtained using cointegration and a non-inverted U-shape as methodologies for instability tests [49]; the relationship between GHG emissions and GDP was considered as the main variable of climate change, and the environmental Kuznets curve was analyzed for the relationship between greenhouse gases and the main aspects of economic development on panel data of groups of countries in the EU [50,51]; the impact of agro-economic factors on GHG emissions in Southeastern Europe was analyzed in comparison to advanced European economies, confirming the EKC hypothesis, which is an inverted U-shaped relation between per capita GDP and carbon dioxide emissions [52]; the effects of renewable energy and non-renewable energy, real income and trade openness on CO 2 emissions for EU countries were analyzed, obtaining different shapes for the EKC curve [53]; the Kuznets hypothesis was examined for the G20 group by introducing other variables-trade openness, the ratio of secondary industry value-added to GDP and population density-and concluded that the hypothesis was verified for developing countries and failed for developed countries [21]; the relationship between economic growth, greenhouse gas emissions, energy taxes and R&D was investigated based on panel data of 22 countries of the EU [54]; and it was demonstrated that the GHG-GDP relationship in terms of sustainable agricultural production in EU countries looks rather like an N-shaped curve [55]. As a result of the analyzes performed, statistical evidence in favor of the existence of an EKC for CO 2 emissions per capita in relation to GDP per capita was not found for 16 EU countries [16].…”
Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%