2016
DOI: 10.5296/jmr.v8i4.9786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reference Model of Sustainability Disclosure based on four Sustainability Stock Indexes

Abstract: The study proposes to develop a reference model of sustainability disclosure based on the models and requirements of four sustainability indexes -Dow Jones Sustainability Index, Corporate Sustainability Index ISE, Frankfurt STOXX and Financial Times FTSE ESG. The approach employed to develop the model is a qualitative analysis of the complementarity among the Stock indexes above mentioned alongside a literature review on sustainability disclosure frameworks. There is no consensus around what should be measured… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The strategic relevance of CSR has also been recognized by the legal entities in the organization of the financial markets, who have introduced in their own rating system specific indexes with the aim of allowing the comparison of the sustainability degree of the companies (Kamal and El-Masry 2016). Moreover, in order to further differentiate the products placed on the market, specific regulations have been introduced with the aim of certifying the degree of sustainability of the securities issued by the companies (Ching et al 2016). The relevance of these information instruments stems from the need to protect investors against companies operating through greenwashing mechanisms (Siano et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategic relevance of CSR has also been recognized by the legal entities in the organization of the financial markets, who have introduced in their own rating system specific indexes with the aim of allowing the comparison of the sustainability degree of the companies (Kamal and El-Masry 2016). Moreover, in order to further differentiate the products placed on the market, specific regulations have been introduced with the aim of certifying the degree of sustainability of the securities issued by the companies (Ching et al 2016). The relevance of these information instruments stems from the need to protect investors against companies operating through greenwashing mechanisms (Siano et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With growing global concerns regarding the scarcity of natural resources, social inequity, rapid environmental degradation, sustainability issues are attracting growing attention and are becoming key concerns for companies and investors in terms of realizing long-term value [15][16][17] and accountability legally and ethically for internal and external actions aimed at ensuring long-term survival [18,19]. Therefore, ESG pillars are a potential source of competitiveness [20,21].…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained will provide a new insight of the nature of the CSSs, different from previous works. Some research compares the general aspects and indicators used in the evaluation processes of the CSSs [7,9,11,15,[18][19][20][21][22]. The main value of this new insight into the CSS's universe, which makes the difference between this and previous analyses, is its multi-stakeholder approach, which any CSR tool must have.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%