2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29952-0_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Refined Exact Algorithm for Edge Dominating Set

Abstract: We present an O * (1.3160 n )-time algorithm for the edge dominating set problem in an n-vertex graph, which improves previous exact algorithms for this problem. The algorithm is analyzed by using the "Measure and Conquer method." We design new branching rules based on conceptually simple local structures, called "clique-producing vertices/cycles," which significantly simplify the algorithm and its running time analysis, attaining an improved time bound at the same time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a cycle c 1 c 2 c 3 c 4 of length 4, we can also branch with (3) by including either {c 1 , c 3 } or {c 2 , c 4 } into V 1 . For the details about the proof of this fact, reader is referred to [21,25,23].…”
Section: An Improved Parameterized Approximation Schemamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a cycle c 1 c 2 c 3 c 4 of length 4, we can also branch with (3) by including either {c 1 , c 3 } or {c 2 , c 4 } into V 1 . For the details about the proof of this fact, reader is referred to [21,25,23].…”
Section: An Improved Parameterized Approximation Schemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the graph is restricted to be of maximum degree 3, the result can be further improved to O * (2.1479 k ) [24]. There is also a long list of contributions to exact algorithms for edge dominating set, such as the O * (1.4423 |V | )-time algorithm by Raman et al [20], the O * (1.4082 |V | )-time algorithm by Fomin et al [15], the O * (1.3226 |V | )-time algorithm by Rooij and Bodlaender [21], and finally the O * (1.3160 |V | )-time algorithm by Xiao and Nagamochi [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the treewidth of graphs, Fomin et al [3] obtained an O * (1.4082 n )-time and exponentialspace algorithm. Analyzing with the measure and conquer method, van Rooij and Bodlaender [10] designed an O * (1.3226 n )-time and polynomial-space algorithm and later Xiao and Nagamochi [14] presented an O * (1.3160 n )-time and polynomial-space algorithm, which currently attains the best time bound to Minimum Edge Dominating Set. For graphs of maximum degree 3, an O * (1.2721 n )-time and polynomial-space algorithm is designed by Xiao and Nagamochi [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fomin et al [7] claimed an O * (1.4082 n )-time algorithm by considering the treewidth of the graphs. Rooij and Bodlaender [19] got an O * (1.3226 n )-time algorithm by using the 'measure and conquer' method, which was further improved to O * (1.3160 n ) [24]. In terms of parameterized algorithms with parameter k being the size of the solution, there are also a long list of contributions to the upper bound of the running time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%