2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Refined Quality Attribute Classification Model for New Product and Service Strategic Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have chosen the parameters a and b in such a way as to build four functions (curves) which are able to reach four different points on the top side of the model (in the points (1, 0.25), (1, 0.5), (1, 0.75) and respectively (1, 1)) and three curves with points on the right side ((0.75, 1), (0.5, 1) and respectively (0.25, 1)). Based on the observation of Pugna et al (2016)’ regarding the overlapping of the curves in the neighborhood of the origin (0,0), we have changed the equation to prevent this from happening.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have chosen the parameters a and b in such a way as to build four functions (curves) which are able to reach four different points on the top side of the model (in the points (1, 0.25), (1, 0.5), (1, 0.75) and respectively (1, 1)) and three curves with points on the right side ((0.75, 1), (0.5, 1) and respectively (0.25, 1)). Based on the observation of Pugna et al (2016)’ regarding the overlapping of the curves in the neighborhood of the origin (0,0), we have changed the equation to prevent this from happening.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used to assess students' requirements Decisionmaking tool for new product in university services (Miclea et al, 2018). Based on the HWWP methodology, new improvements have also been proposed: the Greenhouse model (Dahlgaard et al, 2016), a proactive approach as cited by Lawrence and Hammound (2017), and the HWWP nonlinear approach (Pugna et al, 2016) with strategic purposes. Lin et al (2017) have taken into consideration the HWWP model when researching new classification rules regarding the asymmetric relationship between quality attributes and customer satisfaction.…”
Section: Tools and Models For Customer Requirement Assessment A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quantitative evaluation explains the importance of each quality attribute to customer satisfaction. Such evaluations have been previously performed using classification rules to explain the asymmetric relationship between quality attributes and customer satisfaction [ 20 , 51 53 ]. One study on product development integrated Kano’s model with producer’s capacity [ 44 ].…”
Section: Literature Review and Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%