2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13384-018-0257-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A reflective account of the VET FEE-HELP initiative as a driver of ethical dilemmas for vocational education teachers in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent review of its performance, the Australian Government’s Productivity Commission (2017) reported ‘…rapidly rising student debt, high student non-completion rates, poor labour market outcomes for some students [and] unscrupulous and fraudulent behaviour on the part of some training providers’ (Productivity Commission, 2017: 93). VET qualifications are held in lower esteem than those achieved through university study (Billett et al., 2020), and increasing commercialisation of the sector along with competitive pressures associated with post-1980s neoliberal reforms have resulted in concerns about VET’s reputation and quality (Braithwaite, 2018; Griffin, 2017; Nakar et al., 2018). Alongside these concerns is an ongoing discourse which seeks to improve VET’s efficiency in training provision and its responsiveness and relevance to industry needs (Joyce, 2019; Productivity Commission, 2011, 2019; Skills Senior Officials' Network, 2020).…”
Section: Reformed and Reduced: The Trouble With Australian Vetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review of its performance, the Australian Government’s Productivity Commission (2017) reported ‘…rapidly rising student debt, high student non-completion rates, poor labour market outcomes for some students [and] unscrupulous and fraudulent behaviour on the part of some training providers’ (Productivity Commission, 2017: 93). VET qualifications are held in lower esteem than those achieved through university study (Billett et al., 2020), and increasing commercialisation of the sector along with competitive pressures associated with post-1980s neoliberal reforms have resulted in concerns about VET’s reputation and quality (Braithwaite, 2018; Griffin, 2017; Nakar et al., 2018). Alongside these concerns is an ongoing discourse which seeks to improve VET’s efficiency in training provision and its responsiveness and relevance to industry needs (Joyce, 2019; Productivity Commission, 2011, 2019; Skills Senior Officials' Network, 2020).…”
Section: Reformed and Reduced: The Trouble With Australian Vetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clear example of such a transformation has been experienced in the Australian vocational education sector which saw neoliberal policies open public funding for education and training to various non-public 'providers' including for-profit corporate entities. The effects of these policies have been devastating (Nakar, Bagnall, & Hodge, 2018). Scrambling to grab public money, unscrupulous entrepreneurs, acting in exactly the selfinterested way Adam Smith describes, 'rorted' the system 1leaving thousands of students with debts for incomplete or low-quality credentials shunned by employers, and at the same time weakening the erstwhile public providers of vocational education.…”
Section: Economic Theory Neoliberalism and The Interests Of Educatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the new actors attracted by the construction of a vocational education 'market' appeared to follow Smith's script with great fidelity, the educators struggled against them to maintain their professional practice. The educators were mired in ethical dilemmas created by the reconfigured field and left conflicted and despondent (Nakar et al, 2018). While we should be wary of romanticising educatorsthey possess all the complexities of the average human beingit seems that the neoliberal image of these professionals needs to be challenged.…”
Section: Economic Theory Neoliberalism and The Interests Of Educatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Australia's onshore international educational sector is forecast to grow from 650,000 enrolments in 2018 to 940,000 by 2025 (which equates to a compounding annual growth rate of 3.8 per cent). On average, a student studying at an Australian university spends 2.4 years in Australia, spending A$14,000-37,000 on tuition fees per year (Nakar et al, 2018;McCaig, 2011). The top eight source markets for onshore international learner enrolments across all sectors in 2025 are expected to be China, India, Vietnam, Thailand, Nepal, Malaysia, Brazil and South Korea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%