A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques

Abstract

In an attempt to help find meaning within qualitative data, researchers commonly start by coding their data. There are a number of coding systems available to researchers and this reflexive account explores my reflections on the use of two such techniques. As part of a larger investigation, two pilot studies were undertaken as a means to examine the relative merits of open coding and template coding for examining transcripts. This article does not describe the research project per se but attempts to step back and offer a reflexive account of the development of data coding tools. Here I reflect upon and evaluate the two data coding techniques that were piloted, and discuss how using appropriate aspects of both led to the development of my final data coding approach. My exploration found there was no clear-cut ‘best’ option but that the data coding techniques needed to be reflexively-aligned to meet the specific needs of my project. This reflection suggests that, when coding qualitative data, researchers should be methodologically thoughtful when they attempt to apply any data coding technique; that they do not assume pre-established tools are aligned to their particular paradigm; and that they consider combining and refining established techniques as a means to define their own specific codes. DOI:10.2458/azu_jmmss_v6i1_blair

The voices of death doulas about their role in end‐of‐life care

“…Descriptive statistics were performed on the closed-ended questions to summarise and analyse the quantitative data and are reported as number of respondents (n) and proportion (%) (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0.: IBM Corp). Data from free-text answers were determined a priori due to the categorical nature of the survey questions, which captured what needed to be answered (Blair, 2015). As a result, the qualitative comments served to support and provide clarification of what had emerged in the survey, rather than being theory driven (Whitehead, Dilworth, & Higgins, 2016).…”

Educational Leadership in Post-Colonial Contexts: What Can We Learn from the Experiences of Three Female Principals in Kenyan Secondary Schools?

“…Open coding is an emergent coding technique drawn from grounded theory methodology [38,39]. This method of data analysis generates a participant-generated 'theory' from the data and involves applying codes that are derived from the text [40]. Open-coding is part of the process of developing grounded theory where the researchers search for answers from the data, in this case, the narratives of participants, instead of imposing predetermined constructs.…”

“…In this collaborative process the knowledge and experience of co-author and Kenyan colleague informed both the data collection and data analysis process as we sought to elicit meanings from the narratives of the participants. As Blair [40] suggests we took time to reflect upon our own epistemology and ontology and the ways that this might impact the meanings that we drew from the data. From data analysis the following themes emerged that responded to the research questions; (1) school leadership within a managerial framework; (2) need for more formal school leadership training and preparation; (3) tensions of practice on issues of religion and social class in schools.…”

Nature of Conceptions of Learning in a Collectivistic Society: A Qualitative Case Study of Pakistan

“…Researchers choose theory driven coding referred as Template Coding (Blair, 2015). Researchers identified and used priori codes derived from the theory of learning patterns for different conceptions of learning.…”