A region-building approach to Northern Europe

Abstract

This article argues the case for a new approach to the analysis of regions. It highlights how a region is constantly being denned and redefined by its members in a permanent discourse with each member attempting to identify itself at the core of the region. The core is defined in both territorial and functional terms and this definition necessarily involves a manipulation of knowledge and power. This region building approach utilizes the literature on nation-building and the genealogical writings of anti-foundationalists. It does not, however, attempt to place the study of regions in international relations on a new footing or replace what are arguably the two dominant approaches in the existing literature: an ‘inside-out’ approach focusing on cultural integration and an ‘outside-in’ approach focusing on geopolitics. Rather, it aims to extend the ongoing debate by asking questions about how and why the existence of a given region was postulated in the first place, who perpetuates its existence and with what intentions, and how students of regions, by including or excluding certain areas and peoples, help to perpetuate or transform a given region. After sketching the divergent approaches used to analyze regions, the second part of the article identifies how the two dominant approaches have comprehended Northern Europe, and it then uses the region-building approach to criticize and supplement their findings.

An ocean for the Global South: Brazil and the zone of peace and cooperation in the South Atlantic

“…efforts meant to forge regional identities and organizations in ways that help to advance their material interests and to shape norms-setting processes (Neumann 1994). Whereas in some instances, regional organizations may emerge in a relatively decentralized manner (Acharya 2013), in other contexts rising powers take it upon themselves to lead the efforts, benefitting from existing power asymmetries between them and other states in the region.…”

Geostrategies of the European Neighbourhood Policy

“…After the end of could be put into practice (Neumann, 1994). In short, the emphasis was on discourses of opportunity and promoting a common sense of 'we-ness', and to the extent that security was on the agenda, it was seen as something held in common (Browning and Joenniemi, 2004).…”

Talking to the enemy: track two diplomacy in the Middle East and South Asia

“…24 Security dynamics differ across various regions, while the impact of globalization plays out differently across different areas of 22 Thanks to Michael Yaffe for suggesting these measures of effectiveness as ways for project organizers to evaluate the impact of their efforts. 23 Reference to this specific term can be found in Neumann (1994), although more recent policy-oriented studies have also drawn on this concept. See, for example, Ortega (2004, pp.…”