1977
DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(77)80027-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A regional paediatric hospital dental service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The second method is the Hopkins and Skellam (H&S) index [25,27], which compares the average distance from an epitope to its nearest epitope with the average distance from a random amino acid to the nearest epitope within proteins (Eq. 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1). The second method is the Hopkins and Skellam (H&S) index [25,27], which compares the average distance from an epitope to its nearest epitope with the average distance from a random amino acid to the nearest epitope within proteins (Eq. 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods consider two features of a clustering: the 'intensity' and the 'grain'. The intensity reflects the difference in object density between the rich and poor regions, and the grain describes how frequently rich and poor regions alternate [25]. In this paper we will use two methods: the cumulative binomial probability (CBP) method [26], and the Hopkins and Skellam index (H&S) [25,27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the stand level we used Simpson's index C of concentration (see [ 29 ], p. 309) for measuring the degree to which a stand results from clonal reproduction. This parameter calculates the probability that two individuals (drawn randomly from a population of N individuals without replacement) are identical in their multilocus genotypes: C = {[ n i ( n i - 1)]/[ N ( N - 1)]}, where n i is the number of individuals of genotype i and N is the total number of individuals in the population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%