2014
DOI: 10.1186/1687-6180-2014-97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A regularized matrix factorization approach to induce structured sparse-low-rank solutions in the EEG inverse problem

Abstract: We consider the estimation of the Brain Electrical Sources (BES) matrix from noisy electroencephalographic (EEG) measurements, commonly named as the EEG inverse problem. We propose a new method to induce neurophysiological meaningful solutions, which takes into account the smoothness, structured sparsity, and low rank of the BES matrix. The method is based on the factorization of the BES matrix as a product of a sparse coding matrix and a dense latent source matrix. The structured sparse-low-rank structure is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our assumption on regarding inactive source from sparse rows in C is in agreement with the use of penalty (15) by [MMARPH14]. However, [MMARPH14] did not model a dynamic of z but rather estimated z(t) as a whole time series segment whereas our subspace approach estimates system parameters but not all related signals directly. The state-space model (4)-(5) by [YYR16] was close to our model (6a)-(6c) but the description of state variable (a time series in ROI level) and the system parameter P (a binary matrix) were different from ours.…”
Section: Determine the Estimated State Sequences Frommentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our assumption on regarding inactive source from sparse rows in C is in agreement with the use of penalty (15) by [MMARPH14]. However, [MMARPH14] did not model a dynamic of z but rather estimated z(t) as a whole time series segment whereas our subspace approach estimates system parameters but not all related signals directly. The state-space model (4)-(5) by [YYR16] was close to our model (6a)-(6c) but the description of state variable (a time series in ROI level) and the system parameter P (a binary matrix) were different from ours.…”
Section: Determine the Estimated State Sequences Frommentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Our assumption on inferring inactive sources from sparse rows in C is in agreement with the use of penalty (15) by [MMARPH14]. However, [MMARPH14] did not model source dynamics but rather estimated x ( t ) as a whole time series segment with a prior that some components of x i ( t )’s are entirely zero.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, the source imaging problem becomes an underdetermined problem. [MMARPH14] proposed that the source time series matrix is factorized into coding matrix C and a latent source time series z(t), then x(t) = Cz(t) where C is assumed to be sparse. The relationship between sources and sensors is then explained by y(t) = LCz(t) + v(t).…”
Section: Connectivity On Reconstructed Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%